Case Summary
Chakkaliparambil Koya's children are seeking a partition of the property originally belonging to their father, Chakkaliparambil Koya. The defendant Musthafa has opted to remain exparte in this suit.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
A preliminary decree for partition is passed with a division of the properties into equal shares.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiffs proved their case with cogent and reliable evidence, as the defendant remained exparte.
The plaintiffs proved their case with cogent and reliable evidence, as the defendant remained exparte.
Judgment Evidence:
In the result, the suit is decreed and a preliminary decree for partition is passed as follows: The plaint B, C and D schedule properties shall be divided into 4 equal shares by metes and bounds.
Parties Involved
Plaintiffs
Naseera (30 years)
Naduvattom amsom, Kolathur desom, Tirur Taluk
Shareefa (23 years)
Naduvattom amsom, Kolathur desom, Tirur Taluk
Defendants
Musthafa (22 years)
Naduvattom amsom, Kolathur desom, Tirur Taluk
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Partition
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
A preliminary decree for partition of properties is granted.
Evidence:
Hence the plaintiffs are entitled to get a decree as prayed for.
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Partition Deed
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document demonstrating the ownership of the property by the father of plaintiffs and the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type:
Hjenm Assignment Deed
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document establishing the assignment of property from the father of plaintiffs and the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type:
Jenm Assignment Deed
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document showing the legal transfer of property ownership.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type:
Lawyer Notice
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Notice indicating the plaintiffs' claims regarding partition.
Reference:
Ext.A4