Case Summary
The petitioners are the children of Nambyarath Pocker seeking a partition of property. The respondents are the children of Thengayyith Abdul Salam. The court granted a final decree for partition of the property after considering the Advocate Commissioner's report.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The Advocate Commissioner effectively divided the property in accordance with the preliminary decree.
The Advocate Commissioner effectively divided the property in accordance with the preliminary decree.
Judgment Evidence:
In the result, the petition is allowed and final decree for partition is passed as follows: The decree schedule property shall be divided into 144 (One hundred and forty four) equal shares by metes and bounds.
Parties Involved
Plaintiffs
Sulaikha (43 years)
Puthur amsom, desom, Arichol, PO. Puthoor, Via. Kottakkal, PIN 676 503, Tirurangadi Taluk.
Aminakutty (41 years)
Safiya (39 years)
Muhammedkutty (37 years)
Ramla (34 years)
Defendants
Sunaina (18 years)
Shahasin (16 years)
Muhammed Shafi (14 years)
Thengayyith Abdul Salam (45 years)
Manarkkad, Kottayam.
Others (Age not specified years)
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Declaration
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Final decree for partition of property as per the preliminary decree.
Evidence:
In the result, the petition is allowed and final decree for partition is passed as follows.
Relief Type:
Recovery
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Petitioners are entitled to Rs.29,820/- as the cost of proceedings jointly.
Evidence:
Petitioners are entitled to get Rs.29,820/- as the cost of proceedings jointly.
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Commission Report
Submitted By:
Court
Relevance:
The report submitted by the Advocate Commissioner regarding the division of property.
Reference:
Ext.C1
Document Type:
Commission Plan
Submitted By:
Court
Relevance:
The plan submitted by the Advocate Commissioner detailing the allotment of property.
Reference:
Ext.C2