Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
Original Suit No. 91 OF 2019

Case between Kanhirakkot Yoosuf vs Hafsath regarding Eviction and Arrears of Rent

Court
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Judge
Sri. Jankish Narayanan
Order Date
2019-10-31
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, Kanhirakkot Yoosuf, is seeking eviction of the defendant, Hafsath, for non-payment of rent. The court found that the plaintiff has proven his case and is entitled to the relief sought.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff, allowing eviction and awarding arrears of rent.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The defendant is directed to put the plaintiff in vacant possession of the shop room within 2 months and pay Rs. 1000 per month as rent in arrear.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff, allowing eviction and awarding arrears of rent.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff proved his case by adducng cogent and reliable evidence.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiff proved his case by adducng cogent and reliable evidence.
Supporting Evidence
Since the defendant did not file written statement, the evidence adduced by the plaintiff remained unchallenged. I find no reason to disbelieve PW1. Therefore, I am satisfied that the plaintiff has proved his case by adducing cogent and reliable evidence.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed as follows. 1. The defendant is directed to put the plaintiff in vacant possession of the plaint schedule shop room within 2 months from the date of this order.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Kanhirakkot Yoosuf
Party Age
55
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Hafsath
Party Age
33
Relation
D/o
Plaintiffs Documents
29-10-2018 Lawyer Notice, 10-01-2018 Jenm Assignment Deed.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. M.A.Ismail
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri.V.K.Hareesh.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Eviction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The defendant is directed to put the plaintiff in vacant possession of the plaint schedule shop room.
Evidence:
The defendant is directed to put the plaintiff in vacant possession of the plaint schedule shop room within 2 months from the date of this order.
Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to recover rent in arrear from the defendant.
Evidence:
The plaintiff is also entitled to recover 1000/­ per month as rent in arrear, ₹ from the defendant from 01.02.2017 till the surrender of the building.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is entitled to realize the costs of the suit from the defendant.
Evidence:
Plaintiff is entitled to realize the costs of the suit from the defendant.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The document is a notice issued by the plaintiff's lawyer terminating the lease.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Jenm Assignment Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document establishes the plaintiff's ownership of the property in question.
Reference:
Ext.A2

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Eviction and Rent Control
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Eviction
Case Code
Case between Kanhirakkot Yoosuf vs Hafsath regarding Eviction and Arrears of Rent
Case Code Year
Case between Kanhirakkot Yoosuf vs Hafsath regarding Eviction and Arrears of Rent

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Case Filed
Fri, 10/18/2019 - 12:00
Case Closed
From
Tue, 10/01/2019 - 12:00
To
Thu, 10/31/2019 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
95%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Palakkavalappil Sainaba et al vs Chelakkal Shamsudheen regarding eviction and damages
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Shakkeela vs Kavumpurath Muhammedali et al regarding property possession
Court of Munsiff Magistrate at Tirur, Malappuram
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Chenadan Kunharu Haji et al vs Variyathu Padmanabhan et al regarding delivery of property
Court of the Munsiff Magistrate
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Subrahmanian vs Devaki et al regarding property delivery
Court of the Munsiff Magistrate
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Pidakkal Vasu vs Kuttiyil Balan regarding property delivery
Munsiff Magistrate Court
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won