Case Summary
Chenadan Kunharu Haji and others filed a petition seeking delivery of property from Variyathu Padmanabhan and another, but the court dismissed the petition due to the property being in possession of another individual.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Dismissed petition
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the petition for delivery of property since it was reported that the property was not in the possession of the respondent.
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence
It is reported by the Amin that the petitioner's daughter is running a super market in the petition schedule property. Since the petition schedule property is not in the possession of the respondent, the petition for delivery of property from the possession of the respondent is dismissed
Judgment Evidence:
No steps taken.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Chenadan Kunharu Haji
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Adiyattil Pathumma
- Relation
- W/o Chenadan Kunharu Haji
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Variyathu Padmanabhan
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Koodathu Muhammedkutty Haji
Plaintiffs Documents
Not mentioned
Defendants Documents
Not mentioned
Advocates
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Delivery of Property
Outcome:
Not Decided
Description:
Petition for delivery of property dismissed
Evidence:
It is reported by the Amin that the petitioner's daughter is running a super market in the petition schedule property. Since the petition schedule property is not in the possession of the respondent, the petition for delivery of property from the possession of the respondent is dismissed
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Eviction and Rent Control
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
EP
Case Code Year
2012