Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 166 OF 2018

Case between Palakkavalappil Sainaba et al vs Chelakkal Shamsudheen regarding eviction and damages

Court
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Judge
Sri. JANKISH NARAYANAN
Order Date
2019-09-30
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Palakkavalappil Sainaba and others are suing Chelakkal Shamsudheen for eviction and damages due to non-payment of license fees for shop rooms. The plaintiffs claim the defendant has failed to pay the agreed fees and has remained in unauthorized occupation.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court ruled in favor of the plaintiffs, granting them eviction of the defendant and compensation for wrongful use and occupation of the shop rooms.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Eviction of the defendant and recovery of Rs. 5,000/- per month as compensation from 05.03.2018 until surrender.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff proved ownership of the shop rooms and the defendant's failure to pay the license fee and vacate the premises.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed as follows I. The defendant is directed by way of mandatory injunction, to give vacant possession of the plaint schedule shop rooms to the plaintiff within 2 months from today.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Palakkavalappil Sainaba (80 years years) Vettom amsom desom, P.O.Koottayi, PIN 676 562, Tirur Taluk. Zakkariya (51 years years) Palakkavalappil House, Niramaruthoor amsom desom & Post, PIN 676 109, Tirur Taluk. Fayyas (22 years years) Palakkavalappil House, Niramaruthoor amsom desom & Post, PIN 676 109, Tirur Taluk.

Defendants

Chelakkal Shamsudheen (50 years years) Pachattiri amsom Paravanna desom & Post, Tirur Taluk. PIN 676 502.

Reliefs

Relief Type: Mandatory Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The defendant is directed to give vacant possession of the shop rooms within 2 months.
Evidence:
The defendant is directed by way of mandatory injunction, to give vacant possession of the plaint schedule shop rooms to the plaintiff within 2 months from today.
Relief Type: Eviction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
If the defendant fails to vacate the rooms, the plaintiff may evict the defendant through the court process.
Evidence:
If the defendant fails to vacate the rooms within 2 months, the plaintiff is entitled to evict the defendant from the said rooms through the process of the court.
Relief Type: Damages
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to recover Rs. 5,000/- per month for wrongful use and occupation of the shop rooms.
Evidence:
The plaintiff is also entitled to recover Rs. 5,000/- per month as compensation for wrongful use and occupation of the building consisting of 4 rooms, from the defendant from 05.03.2018 till the surrender of the scheduled rooms.
Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to recover the costs of the suit from the defendant.
Evidence:
Plaintiff is entitled to realize the costs of the suit from the defendant.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: License Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The license agreement establishes the terms under which the defendant was allowed to use the shop rooms and highlights the failure to pay the license fee.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Registered Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The notice terminated the license agreement and demanded the surrender of the shop rooms.
Reference:
Ext.A2(a)
Document Type: Postal receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
It serves as proof of sending the termination notice to the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A2(b)
Document Type: Returned cover with A/D Card
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
It confirms that the termination notice was delivered to the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Oral Evidence
Submitted By: Oral evidence
Relevance:
The testimony provided by the plaintiff’s witness supports the claims made in the case.
Reference:

Quick Facts

Location
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases