Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
EP 15/2015

Case between Sulaikhabi et al vs Nalakath Ahammed Shereef et al regarding property delivery

Court
Munsiff Magistrate Court
Judge
Sri. Biju. V.G
Order Date
2015-07-07
Duration
0 years 5 months 22 days
Case Code No.
15
Case Closed
Tue, 07/07/2015 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Decree holders filed a case seeking property delivery, but the petition was dismissed for default due to no steps taken for delivery.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The petition for property delivery was dismissed for default.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Not available
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The petition for property delivery was dismissed for default.
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Why Defendant Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

No steps taken to effect delivery of the property. Hence the petition is dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
K.L. Sulaikhabi
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Muhammed Ashraf
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
N.Sulphikkar Ahammed
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
N. Shahina
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Kottathara Nalakath Ahammed Shereef
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Abdul Azeez
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Abdul Razak
Relation
Died
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Valliyengal Subaida
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Muhammed Ajmal
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sainaba
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Shibila
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Jifila
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sulaikha Beevi
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Suharabi
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
S.Hariharan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Advocate appearing for Kottathara Nalakath Ahammed Shereef-R1
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Unknown
Outcome: Not Decided
Description:
Property delivery
Evidence:

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Eviction and Rent Control
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
EP
Case Code Year
2015

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur, Malappuram
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Case Filed
Fri, 01/16/2015 - 12:00
Case Closed
Tue, 07/07/2015 - 12:00
From
Wed, 07/01/2015 - 12:00
To
Fri, 07/31/2015 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases

Case between Shakkeela vs Kavumpurath Muhammedali et al regarding property possession
Court of Munsiff Magistrate at Tirur, Malappuram
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Pidakkal Vasu vs Kuttiyil Balan regarding property delivery
Munsiff Magistrate Court
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Pathummakutty vs Kunhipathumma et al regarding property delivery
Court of the Munsiff Magistrate
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Hense Raj-P1 vs Gladis regarding property delivery
Munsiff Magistrate Court
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Hajeesh vs Paraparambil Narayanan et al regarding property delivery
Court of the Munsiff Magistrate
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won