Case Summary
M/s Bharathy Auto Finance filed a suit against Subair for money. The case was heard ex parte due to the absence of the defendant.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court rejected the plaint due to balance court fee not being paid. The defendant was absent and the case was heard ex parte.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Balance Court fee not paid. Plaint rejected u/o VII Rule 11.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- M/s Bharathy Auto Finance
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Subair
- Party Age
- 38
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Not available
Defendants Documents
Not available
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. P.Viswanathan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri.Vivek.P.
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Rejected
Description:
Plaint rejected due to balance court fee not paid.
Evidence:
Balance Court fee not paid. Plaint rejected u/o VII Rule 11.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Non-payment of rent
Case Code
Case between M/s Bharathy Auto Finance vs Subair regarding money
Case Code Year
Case between M/s Bharathy Auto Finance vs Subair regarding money