Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 140 OF 2018

Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Sailesh kumar regarding realisation of money

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Judge
Smt.SUSHAMA.P.
Order Date
2019-05-27
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Kerala Gramin Bank filed a suit against Sailesh kumar for the recovery of loan amount due to non-payment. The defendant admitted the claim in the written statement.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The suit is decreed in favor of the plaintiff, allowing the recovery of the claimed amount from the defendant within six months. The defendant is also liable for interest and costs.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The defendants do pay a sum of ₹1,34,234/- with interest @ 12% per annum from the date of suit till the date of the decree within 6 months.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit is decreed in favor of the plaintiff, allowing the recovery of the claimed amount from the defendant within six months. The defendant is also liable for interest and costs.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The defendants admitted the plaint claim in their written statement.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The defendants admitted the plaint claim in their written statement.
Supporting Evidence
The learned counsel for the plaintiff submitted that the plaint claim is admitted by the defendants through their written statement.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed with costs as follows: (a) The defendants do pay a sum of ₹1,34,234/- with interest @ 12 % per annum from the date of suit till the date of the decree within 6 months from today.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Kerala Gramin Bank
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sailesh kumar
Party Age
26
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. C.M.Venugopalan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Smt.Sreekala.K.
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Smt.Vinida.P
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri.Vipin.K.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The defendants are ordered to pay a sum of ₹1,34,234/- with interest at 12% per annum.
Evidence:
In the result, the suit is decreed with costs as follows: (a) The defendants do pay a sum of ₹1,34,234/- with interest @ 12 % per annum from the date of suit till the date of the decree within 6 months from today.
Relief Type: Interest
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The defendants are ordered to pay thereafter an interest of 6% per annum on the principal amount from the date of the decree till its realization.
Evidence:
(b) The defendant do pay thereafter an interest @ 6% per annum on the principal amount from the date of the decree till its realization.
Relief Type: Costs
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The defendants are ordered to pay costs to the plaintiff.
Evidence:
(c) Costs shall follow the event. Hence the defendant do pay costs to the plaintiff.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Deed of Hypothecation
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The document is pertinent as it establishes the loan agreement and terms for the hypothecation of the vehicle purchased with the loan.
Reference:

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Non-payment of rent
Case Code
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Sailesh kumar regarding realisation of money
Case Code Year
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Sailesh kumar regarding realisation of money

Quick Facts

Location
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Case Filed
Mon, 05/27/2019 - 12:00
Case Closed
From
Wed, 05/01/2019 - 12:00
To
Sun, 05/31/2026 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between Vijaya Bank, Rep. By its Branch Manager vs Peethambaran.T. regarding realization of money
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Vijaya Bank, Tirur Branch vs Kadeeja regarding realization of money
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Pamila.V.S. et al regarding realization of money
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Alikutty regarding realisation of money
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Canara Bank vs Mahesh.P. P regarding realisation of money
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won