Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 261 OF 2018

Case between Vijaya Bank, Tirur Branch vs Kadeeja regarding realization of money

Court
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Judge
Sri. JANKISH NARAYANAN
Order Date
2019-08-26
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Vijaya Bank is seeking to recover a loan amount from Kadeeja. The defendant defaulted on the loan repayments despite repeated demands from the plaintiff.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court ruled in favor of Vijaya Bank and decreed the suit for the amount due along with interest. The defendant did not contest the claims made by the plaintiff.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
An amount of Rs 34,845/- with interest at the rate of 11.65% per annum from the date of suit till realization.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff proved the case by adducible evidence which remained unchallenged.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed as follows. Plaintiff is entitled to realise an amount of Rs 34,845/- (Rupees Thirty Four thousand Eight Hundred and Forty Five only) with interest at the rate of 11.65 % per annum from the date of suit till the realization.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Vijaya Bank (Age not specified years)

Defendants

Kadeeja (45 years) Pulikkal House, Athavanadu amsom desom, Valancheri.P.O. Tirur Taluk.

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff sought to recover the outstanding loan amount from the defendant.
Evidence:
Therefore, I am satisfied that the plaintiff has proved his case by adducing cogent and reliable evidence. Hence the plaintiff is entitled to a decree as prayed for.
Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is entitled to recover the costs of the suit from the defendants.
Evidence:
Plaintiff is entitled to realise the costs of the suit from the defendants.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Loan Sanction
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The document indicates the loan amount approved for the defendant on a specific date.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Demand Promissory Note
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document outlines the defendant's obligation to repay the loan amount with interest.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Letter of Repayment
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This letter sets out the repayment terms agreed upon by the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Loan Agreement cum Hypothecation Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This agreement contains the terms under which the loan was provided and secured.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document serves as proof that the defendant was formally notified of the default.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Statement of Accounts
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document shows the financial details related to the loan transaction.
Reference:
Ext.A6

Quick Facts

Location
Case Filed
Mon, 01/22/2018 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases