Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 106 OF 2015

Case between Moideenkutty vs Ummer Farook regarding mandatory injunction and realization of arrears of rent.

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Judge
Sri. JANKISH NARAYANAN
Order Date
2019-08-26
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Moideenkutty, the plaintiff, is seeking a mandatory injunction against Ummer Farook, the defendant, for non-payment of rent and to vacate the property he has occupied. The plaintiff claims that the defendant has failed to pay rent since November 2013 and has a total arrear of Rs. 19,540.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court ruled in favor of the plaintiff, granting him a mandatory injunction to vacate the property and also allowing the realization of arrears of rent. The defendant was ordered to pay costs of the suit.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Mandatory injunction to vacate the property and realization of arrears of rent of Rs. 19,540 with interest at 12%.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court ruled in favor of the plaintiff, granting him a mandatory injunction to vacate the property and also allowing the realization of arrears of rent. The defendant was ordered to pay costs of the suit.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The defendant was ex parte and failed to challenge the evidence presented by the plaintiff.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The defendant was ex parte and failed to challenge the evidence presented by the plaintiff.
Supporting Evidence
Though the defendant filed written statement disputing the claim of the plaintiffs, he opted to remain ex parte, when the case is included in the special list for trial. The evidence adduced by the plaintiff remains unchallenged.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed as follows:- The defendant is hereby directed by way of mandatory injunction, to vacate the plaint schedule property within a period of one month from today, to the plaintiff.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Moideenkutty
Party Age
60
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Ummer Farook
Party Age
38
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Jenam Assignment deed No.3876/2013, Rent Agreement dated 03.01.2013, Lawyer Notice dated 3-02-2015.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. M.A. Ismail
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Mandatory Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff directed to vacate the plaint schedule property.
Evidence:
The defendant is hereby directed by way of mandatory injunction, to vacate the plaint schedule property within a period of one month from today, to the plaintiff.
Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff allowed to realize an amount of Rs. 19,540/- with interest.
Evidence:
Plaintiff is allowed to realize an amount of Rs. 19,540/- (Rupees Nineteen Thousand Five Hundred and Forty only) with interest @ 12 % per annum from the defendant from the date of suit till the date of the decree.
Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff entitled to recover Rs. 1000/- per month until possession is gained.
Evidence:
The plaintiff is also entitled to realize Rs. 1000/- per month as rent from the date of suit till the getting possession of the plaint schedule building from the defendant.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Defendant directed to pay costs of the suit to the plaintiff.
Evidence:
The defendant is directed to pay costs of the suit to the plaintiff.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Jenam Assignment
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Back document of the said deed.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Jenam Assignment
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Back document of the said deed.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Jenam Assignment
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document indicating ownership of the property.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Rent Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Agreement detailing the rental terms.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Tax receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Evidence of tax payment related to the property.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Cash Receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Proof of payment for the property/related expenses.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Notice issued to the defendant regarding the termination of lease.
Reference:
Ext.A7

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Eviction and Rent Control
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Non-payment of rent
Case Code
Case between Moideenkutty vs Ummer Farook regarding mandatory injunction and realization of arrears of rent.
Case Code Year
Case between Moideenkutty vs Ummer Farook regarding mandatory injunction and realization of arrears of rent.

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Thu, 08/01/2019 - 12:00
To
Sat, 08/31/2019 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
95%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Fousiya vs Raramkandath Usmankoya et al regarding realization of arrear of rent.
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Asokan vs Kunnathakath Abdurahman regarding realization of arrears of rent.
THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Puthooril Pocker Haji vs Mulamukkil Anil regarding eviction and damages for use and occupation
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Shakkeela vs Kavumpurath Muhammedali et al regarding property possession
Court of Munsiff Magistrate at Tirur, Malappuram
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Chenadan Kunharu Haji et al vs Variyathu Padmanabhan et al regarding delivery of property
Court of the Munsiff Magistrate
Civil Suit Defendant Won