Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 123 OF 2018

Case between Asokan vs Kunnathakath Abdurahman regarding realization of arrears of rent.

Court
THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Judge
Sri. JANKISH NARAYANAN
Order Date
2019-09-30
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Asokan is the plaintiff who has let out shop rooms to Kunnathakath Abdurahman for conducting a business. Asokan is claiming arrears of rent amounting to Rs. 80,136 from Kunnathakath Abdurahman for non-payment of rent since 2010.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff, allowing him to realize Rs. 80,136 along with interest and costs from the defendant for arrears of rent.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The plaintiff is allowed to realise Rs.80,136 with interest @ 6% per annum from the defendant.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff proved his case by adduced cogent and reliable evidence.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed as follows. The plaintiff is allowed to realise Rs.80,136 (Rupees Eighty Thousand One Hundred and Thirty Six only) with interest @ 6% per annum from the date of decree till realization, from the defendant and his assets, towards the arrears of rent.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Asokan (52 years years) ' Asok' ,Thrikkandiyur amsom desom, Tirur Taluk PIN 676 104.

Defendants

Kunnathakath Abdurahman (40 years years) 'Maxi World', M G Building, Opp. Cristian Church, Thazhepalam, Tirur.

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is allowed to realise Rs.80,136/- with interest from the defendant.
Evidence:
The plaintiff is entitled to get Rs, 80,136/- being the arrears of rent from April 2015 to March 2018 for a period of 36 months with 6% interest thereon from the defendant.
Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to realise the costs of the suit from the defendant.
Evidence:
The plaintiff is entitled to realise the costs of the suit from the defendant.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Notice demanding payment of arrears of rent.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Order
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Photocopy of order in RCA No.18/10 relevant to the case.
Reference:
Ext.A2

Quick Facts

Location
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases