Case Summary
Asokan is the plaintiff who has let out shop rooms to Kunnathakath Abdurahman for conducting a business. Asokan is claiming arrears of rent amounting to Rs. 80,136 from Kunnathakath Abdurahman for non-payment of rent since 2010.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The plaintiff is allowed to realise Rs.80,136 with interest @ 6% per annum from the defendant.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff, allowing him to realize Rs. 80,136 along with interest and costs from the defendant for arrears of rent.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff proved his case by adduced cogent and reliable evidence.
The plaintiff proved his case by adduced cogent and reliable evidence.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiff proved his case by adduced cogent and reliable evidence.
The plaintiff proved his case by adduced cogent and reliable evidence.
Supporting Evidence
I find no reason to disbelieve PW1. Therefore, I am satisfied that the plaintiff has proved his case by adducing cogent and reliable evidence.
Judgment Evidence:
In the result, the suit is decreed as follows. The plaintiff is allowed to realise Rs.80,136 (Rupees Eighty Thousand One Hundred and Thirty Six only) with interest @ 6% per annum from the date of decree till realization, from the defendant and his assets, towards the arrears of rent.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Asokan
- Party Age
- 52
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Kunnathakath Abdurahman
- Party Age
- 40
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Copy of Lawyer Notice dated 3-2-2018, Photocopy of Order in RCA No.18/10 in RCP No.27/2008.
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. C.Nandakumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri.Sanku.T.Das
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Recovery
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is allowed to realise Rs.80,136/- with interest from the defendant.
Evidence:
The plaintiff is entitled to get Rs, 80,136/- being the arrears of rent from April 2015 to March 2018 for a period of 36 months with 6% interest thereon from the defendant.
Relief Type:
Recovery
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to realise the costs of the suit from the defendant.
Evidence:
The plaintiff is entitled to realise the costs of the suit from the defendant.
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Lawyer Notice
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Notice demanding payment of arrears of rent.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type:
Order
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Photocopy of order in RCA No.18/10 relevant to the case.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Eviction and Rent Control
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Non-payment of rent
Case Code
Case between Asokan vs Kunnathakath Abdurahman regarding realization of arrears of rent.
Case Code Year
Case between Asokan vs Kunnathakath Abdurahman regarding realization of arrears of rent.