Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
Original Suit No. 274 OF 2017

Case between Sunil vs Abdul Azees regarding eviction and compensation

Court
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Judge
Sri. JANKISH NARAYANAN
Order Date
2019-07-24
Duration
Case Closed
Wed, 07/24/2019 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Sunil filed a suit against Abdul Azees for eviction and compensation for wrongful use of a shop room. The court found in favor of Sunil as the defendant failed to vacate the premises despite multiple notices.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court ruled in favor of the plaintiff, ordering the defendant to vacate the shop room and pay compensation for wrongful use. The plaintiff was deemed to have proven the case against the absence of the defendant.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Defendant is directed to put the plaintiff in vacant possession of the shop room and pay the plaintiff Rs. 5000/- per month as compensation.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court ruled in favor of the plaintiff, ordering the defendant to vacate the shop room and pay compensation for wrongful use. The plaintiff was deemed to have proven the case against the absence of the defendant.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff established the tenancy and its termination through unchallenged evidence.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiff established the tenancy and its termination through unchallenged evidence.
Supporting Evidence
The plaintiff has adduced evidence in tune with the averments in the plaint. Since the defendants remained ex parte, the evidence adduced by the plaintiff remained unchallenged. I find no reason to disbelieve PW1.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed as follows. I. The defendant is directed to put the plaintiff in vacant possession of the plaint schedule shop room within 2 months from the date of this order.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Sunil
Party Age
44
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Abdul Azees
Party Age
58
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Jenm Assignment Deed, Rectification Deed, Tax receipt, Ownership certificate, Building tax receipt, Lawyer Notice, Postal receipt
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Abhilash. A.J
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Smt. Remya.C.T
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Possession
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Defendant is directed to put the plaintiff in vacant possession of the plaint schedule shop room.
Evidence:
The defendant is directed to put the plaintiff in vacant possession of the plaint schedule shop room within 2 months from the date of this order.
Relief Type: Damages
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is entitled to recover monthly rent of Rs. 5000/- from the defendant for the period specified.
Evidence:
The plaintiff is entitled to recover monthly rent of Rs. 5000/- per month from 01.04.2016 to 25.10.2016, from the defendant.
Relief Type: Compensation
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is entitled to recover compensation for wrongful use and occupation of the room.
Evidence:
The plaintiff is also entitled to recover Rs. 5000/- per month as compensation for wrongful use and occupation of the room, from the defendant from 25.11.2016 till the surrender of the scheduled room.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is entitled to realize the costs of the suit from the defendant.
Evidence:
Plaintiff is entitled to realize the costs of the suit from the defendant.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Jenam Assignment Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document proving ownership of the plaint schedule shop room.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Rectification Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document related to the ownership of the plaint schedule shop room.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Tax receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document providing proof of tax payment related to the shop room.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Ownership Certificate
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document certifying the ownership of the plaint schedule shop room.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Building Tax Receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document supporting the ownership and tax records of the shop room.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Copy of Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Notice terminating the tenancy served to the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Postal receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Proof of sending the notice to the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A7

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Eviction and Rent Control
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Unauthorized occupation
Case Code
Case between Sunil vs Abdul Azees regarding eviction and compensation
Case Code Year
Case between Sunil vs Abdul Azees regarding eviction and compensation

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Case Filed
Sun, 01/01/2017 - 12:00
Case Closed
Wed, 07/24/2019 - 12:00
From
Mon, 07/01/2019 - 12:00
To
Wed, 07/31/2019 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Shakkeela vs Kavumpurath Muhammedali et al regarding property possession
Court of Munsiff Magistrate at Tirur, Malappuram
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Chenadan Kunharu Haji et al vs Variyathu Padmanabhan et al regarding delivery of property
Court of the Munsiff Magistrate
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Subrahmanian vs Devaki et al regarding property delivery
Court of the Munsiff Magistrate
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Pidakkal Vasu vs Kuttiyil Balan regarding property delivery
Munsiff Magistrate Court
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Palakka Valappil Pelayam parambil Hamza @ Bava vs Kalleri Mohandas regarding recovery of possession
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Civil Suit Defendant Won