Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 373 OF 2017

Case between Hyder Haji vs Kurikkale kalathil Bava regarding Arrears of Rent and Damages.

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Judge
Smt.SUSHAMA.P.
Order Date
2019-06-01
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Hyder Haji filed a suit against Kurikkale kalathil Bava for arrears of rent and damages after the defendant vacated the rented premises. The court found in favor of the plaintiff due to the defendant's failure to pay rent and damages.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed that Hyder Haji is entitled to recover Rs. 11,700 for rent and Rs. 10,000 for damages from Kurikkale kalathil Bava.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed that Hyder Haji is entitled to recover Rs. 11,700 for rent and Rs. 10,000 for damages from Kurikkale kalathil Bava.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The evidence presented by the plaintiff was unchallenged and credible.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The evidence presented by the plaintiff was unchallenged and credible.
Supporting Evidence
The evidence of PW1 coupled with Ext. A1 and A1 (a), the case put forward by the plaintiff is probable to believe and hence accepted.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed as follows: a) The plaintiff is entitled to realise Rs. 11,700/- being the rent arrears from 18.11.2016 to 31.05.2017 with interest @ 6% from 18.11.2016 to 31.05.2017.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Hyder Haji
Party Age
75
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Mujeeb Rahman
Party Age
38
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Kurikkale kalathil Bava
Party Age
60
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Copy of Lawyer notice dated 22-9-2017, Acknowledgment Card.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. K.P.Khaleel Ibrahim
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.E.P.Rafeekh
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is entitled to realise Rs. 11,700/- being the rent arrears from 18.11.2016 to 31.05.2017 with interest.
Evidence:
The plaintiff is entitled to realise Rs. 11,700/- being the rent arrears from 18.11.2016 to 31.05.2017 with interest @ 6% from 18.11.2016 to 31.05.2017.
Relief Type: Damages
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is entitled to realise Rs. 10,000/- towards damages.
Evidence:
The plaintiff is entitled to realise Rs.10,000/- towards damages.
Relief Type: Costs
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is entitled to realise the costs of the suit from the defendant.
Evidence:
Plaintiff is entitled to realise the costs of the suit from the defendant.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The document is a lawyer's notice demanding the arrears of rent and damages from the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Acknowledgment card
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The acknowledgment card is associated with the lawyer notice sent to the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A1(a)

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Eviction and Rent Control
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Arrears of Rent
Case Code
Case between Hyder Haji vs Kurikkale kalathil Bava regarding Arrears of Rent and Damages.
Case Code Year
Case between Hyder Haji vs Kurikkale kalathil Bava regarding Arrears of Rent and Damages.

Quick Facts

Location
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Case Filed
Sun, 10/16/2016 - 12:00
Case Closed
From
Sat, 06/01/2019 - 12:00
To
Sun, 06/30/2019 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Shakkeela vs Kavumpurath Muhammedali et al regarding property possession
Court of Munsiff Magistrate at Tirur, Malappuram
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Chenadan Kunharu Haji et al vs Variyathu Padmanabhan et al regarding delivery of property
Court of the Munsiff Magistrate
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Subrahmanian vs Devaki et al regarding property delivery
Court of the Munsiff Magistrate
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Pidakkal Vasu vs Kuttiyil Balan regarding property delivery
Munsiff Magistrate Court
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Pathummakutty vs Kunhipathumma et al regarding property delivery
Court of the Munsiff Magistrate
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won