Case Summary
Cheruvalappil Abdu filed a suit for eviction against Cheruvalappil Hamzakutty. The case was dismissed for default as the plaintiff was absent during the hearing.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed because the plaintiff was absent during the hearing.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff's absence led to the dismissal of the case.
The plaintiff's absence led to the dismissal of the case.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff's absence led to the dismissal of the case.
The plaintiff's absence led to the dismissal of the case.
Supporting Evidence
The court noted that the plaintiff was absent and the suit could not proceed.
Judgment Evidence:
Suit is dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Cheruvalappil Abdu
- Party Age
- 71
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Cheruvalappil Hamzakutty
- Party Age
- 65
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri.K.P.Khaleel Ibrahim
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri.V. Chandrasekharan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri.Vipin.K.
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Eviction
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
Suit for eviction.
Evidence:
Suit is dismissed for default.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Eviction and Rent Control
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Cheruvalappil Abdu vs Cheruvalappil Hamzakutty regarding eviction.
Case Code Year
Case between Cheruvalappil Abdu vs Cheruvalappil Hamzakutty regarding eviction.