Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
RP 2634/2012

Case between Hamza vs Erattaparambil Hamza et al regarding petition allowance with costs

Court
Munsiff Magistrate Court
Judge
Sri. Sanu C
Order Date
2013-02-23
Duration
0 years, 4 months, 7 days
Case Code No.
2634
Case Closed
Sat, 02/23/2013 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Petitioner Hamza filed a petition seeking a favorable decision, which was allowed on the condition of paying a cost of RS.1000, later paid.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The petition by Hamza was allowed under the condition that a cost of RS.1000 be paid, which was later paid.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Petition allowed on the condition of paying cost of RS.1000
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The petition by Hamza was allowed under the condition that a cost of RS.1000 be paid, which was later paid.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
Not available

Judgment Evidence:

Petition allowed on condition of paying cost of RS.1000.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Hamza
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Erattaparambil Hamza
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Erattaparambil Basheer
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Machinjeri Ali
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Annath Sulaiman
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Erattaparambil Kunhava
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Choorakkodan Sharafudheen
Plaintiffs Documents
Not available
Defendants Documents
Not available

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
M.A.Ismail
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Arshad Ayyoob
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Petition allowance
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Petition allowed on condition of paying cost of RS.1000
Evidence:
Petition allowed on condition of paying cost of RS.1000.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
RP
Case Code Year
2012

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur, Malappuram
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Case Filed
Mon, 11/05/2012 - 12:00
Case Closed
Sat, 02/23/2013 - 12:00
From
Tue, 01/01/2013 - 12:00
To
Sun, 03/31/2013 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Mullanmadakkal Mammi vs Beeran Haji et al regarding petition on medical grounds
Court of the Munsiff Magistrate
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Vettikkat Parikkuzhiyil Beerali vs Thayyil Kader Haji regarding unknown matter
Munsiff Magistrate Court
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between P.Damkumar vs Palakkavalappil Puthiyamaliyekkal Gulam Ali et al regarding default
Munsiff Magistrate Court
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Muhammed Thameem vs Muhammed Abdul Noor regarding Default Judgment
Munsiff Magistrate Court
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Vineeshkumar et al vs Kumaran regarding compliance with High Court directions
Court of the Munsiff Magistrate
Civil Suit Defendant Won