Similar Cases
Based on: OS. 615/2025 — Case between Kiran Krishna vs S.D. Ajith Kumar regarding Temporary Injunction
48 matching cases found, ranked by shared legal context
OS. No.788/2019
Case between Saneer et al vs Sijo Mary regarding discharge of temporary injunction.
The case involves Saneer and Fousiya as additional defendants, seeking to discharge a temporary injunction obtained by the plaintiff, Sijo Mary. The plaintiff claims a right of way over the property owned by the defendants, leading to disputes over property access.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No. 237/2022
Case between Suresh Kumar.S. vs Narayana Pillai et al regarding Permanent Prohibitory Injunction
The plaintiffs, Suresh Kumar.S. and Bindu Lekha, are seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants, Narayana Pillai and Madhusudhanan Pillai, to prevent them from interfering with the construction of boundary walls on their property. The plaintiffs assert that they are the rightful owners of the property and have faced disturbances from the defendants.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No.994/2016
Case between Raveendran Pillai et al vs Kerala State et al regarding injunction.
Raveendran Pillai and Beena filed a suit against the Kerala State and other defendants regarding an injunction. The suit was dismissed as not pressed by the plaintiffs.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS. No.210/2025
Case between Meloot Sree Durga Padmavathy Devi Temple et al vs Biju Panicker et al regarding Temporary Injunction
The petitioners include the Meloot Sree Durga Padmavathy Devi Temple and its representatives, who are seeking a temporary injunction against the respondents to prevent them from obstructing the reinstallation of the temple idol. The respondents include members of the temple committee who are alleged to be causing disruptions.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No. 535/2021
Case between Yesudasan vs Jincy et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
The plaintiff, Yesudasan, filed a suit for a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants Jincy, Binu, and an unnamed older defendant. The case arose from disputes over a pathway used by both parties and previous incidents of trespassing and threats by the defendants.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No. 535/2021
Case between Yesudasan vs Jincy et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiff, Yesudasan, claims ownership of a property and seeks a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants who have allegedly trespassed and threatened him. The defendants express interest in purchasing the property but resort to violence when their demands are not met.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No. 1011/2023
Case between Dileep K J vs Raju et al regarding Permanent Prohibitory Injunction
The plaintiff Dileep K J is seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants Raju and his family members, who are allegedly threatening to encroach upon his property. The plaintiff claims ownership of the land and seeks to prevent defendants from trespassing and demolishing his property boundary.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No. 828/2018
Case between Vishnu vs N. Muthulakshmi et al regarding Permanent Prohibitory Injunction
Vishnu filed a suit against N. Muthulakshmi and Ramdas Potty for a permanent prohibitory injunction to restrain the defendants from evicting him from the rented property. The plaintiff claimed that the defendants threatened him to vacate the premises unlawfully.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS. No. 166/2023
Case between Adv.V.Vinayachandran et al vs Gayathri Devi regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
The plaintiffs, three advocates, are tenants of rooms owned by the defendant and are seeking to prevent eviction due to a rent hike. They claim that the defendant's actions threaten their peaceful possession and enjoyment of the property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No. 815/2023
Case between Sadasivan vs Shiju regarding Permanent Prohibitory Injunction
The plaintiff, Sadasivan, filed a suit against the defendant, Shiju, seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction to restrain the defendant from obstructing the pathway on his property. The case revolves around the plaintiff's right to use the B schedule pathway for agricultural purposes.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No. 284/2023
Case between Sasikumar vs Ushadevarajan, Thankamani Vijayan regarding permanent prohibitory Injunction
The plaintiff, Sasikumar, is seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants, Ushadevarajan and Thankamani Vijayan, who are allegedly attempting to encroach upon his property. The defendants have also obstructed the reconstruction of a compound wall.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No. 976/2023
Case between Emilin Binoy et al vs Thresya Fernandes @ Tresa Albert et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
The plaintiff, Emilin Binoy, seeks a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants, Thresya Fernandes and Jannet, who are attempting to illegally encroach on her property. The plaintiff claims ownership of the property and has faced threats and harassment from the defendants.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No. 304/2022
Case between Karmali vs Charles regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiff Karmali, the absolute owner of a property, filed a suit against the defendant Charles for obstructing access to her property. The defendant allegedly began blocking the only pathway leading to the plaintiff's property, claiming ownership of an adjacent area.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS 470/2024
Case between Soman Pillai vs Radhakrishna Pillai regarding temporary injunction.
Soman Pillai filed a petition against Radhakrishna Pillai for a temporary injunction concerning a property dispute. The plaintiff claims the defendant encroached on his property and caused damage.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS. No. 753/2024
Case between Sankaran Nampoothiri vs Kollam Muncipal Corporation regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
Sankaran Nampoothiri is the plaintiff seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against Kollam Muncipal Corporation. The plaintiff alleges that the defendant is planning to trespass and demolish boundary walls of his property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No. 704/2018
Case between Ansad et al vs Jameela Beevi et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiffs, Ansad and Nabeesath, are seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants, Jameela Beevi and Nadirsha, to prevent them from interfering with a pathway they have been using for access to their properties. The defendants deny the existence of the pathway and claim it belongs solely to them.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No. 807/2024
Case between G. Haridasan Potty vs Perumon Sree Durga Bhagavathy Temple Devaswom et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
G. Haridasan Potty filed a suit for permanent prohibitory injunction against Perumon Sree Durga Bhagavathy Temple Devaswom after the defendants aimed to obstruct his daily rituals at the temple. The case centers around the plaintiff's rights to perform rituals at the temple without interference.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS.No.123/2020
Case between G.Rajesh et al vs State of Kerala et al regarding injunction.
The plaintiffs, G.Rajesh and T. Jayasree, filed a suit for injunction against the State of Kerala and other defendants. The suit was dismissed as not pressed by the plaintiffs.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS. No. 342/2022
Case between Kanjirammoodu Sree Nagaraja Temple et al vs Bhasuran et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiffs, Kanjirammoodu Sree Nagaraja Temple and its Secretary Ganesh.T, are seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants, Bhasuran and Selvakumar. The case revolves around the defendants creating disturbances and attempting to encroach upon the temple property, which is managed by the new committee elected after the defendants were removed.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No. 601/2020
Case between Reghu. K et al vs Rengan et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
The plaintiffs, Reghu. K, Ratheesh. K, and Omana, are seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants, Rengan, Ponnamma, and Radhika Rengan, to restrain them from encroaching upon a pathway claimed by the plaintiffs. The defendants contend that the pathway is their property and deny the plaintiffs' right to use it.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No. 194/2022
Case between Richard Hentry vs Nickolas Joseph et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
Richard Hentry, the plaintiff, claims ownership and possession of a property from which he seeks protection against the defendants, his neighbors, who he alleges are attempting to trespass. The defendants are also his business partners.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No. 14/2025
Case between Sugathan vs Shyama et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiff Sugathan claims ownership of property and seeks a permanent injunction against the defendants for trespassing and damaging his property. The defendants, including Shyama and others, have allegedly attempted to widen a pathway and have caused damage to the plaintiff's property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No. 601/2024
Case between Nazimudheen vs Shahul Hameed et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
Nazimudheen filed a suit against the defendants for permanent prohibitory injunction to restrain them from trespassing into his property. The plaintiff claimed he is the absolute owner and has been facing attempts of trespass by the defendants.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No. 453/2020
Case between Nazeeb vs Nizamudheen regarding injunction
The case involves a suit filed by Nazeeb against Nizamudheen over illegal construction. The plaintiff claims that the defendant began unauthorized construction that violated the Kerala Panchayath Raj Act.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.109/2024
Case between Rini Titus et al vs Stephen Gomez et al regarding restraining from trespassing into properties
The case involves petitioners Rini Titus and Francis Gabriel seeking to restrain the respondents Stephen Gomez, Shaila, and Sherly Rajendran from trespassing into their properties and creating a new pathway. The petitioners claim that the respondents have falsely claimed a right of way through their properties.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS. 627/2014
Case between Rabinsa @ Raphis Firdouz vs Safunnisa regarding declaration of title and recovery of possession.
The petitioner/defendant, Safunnisa, is contesting a request for further information from the plaintiff, Rabinsa @ Raphis Firdouz, regarding a school admission register. The court is reviewing the plaintiff's compliance with previous orders about document production.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS. 988/2016
Case between Radha vs Sujatha et al regarding withdrawal of suit with liberty to file a fresh suit.
Radha, the plaintiff, is involved in a case against Sujatha and Anilkumar regarding the fixation of boundaries and injunctions related to property. The plaintiff has requested to withdraw the suit to file a fresh case.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. 579/2012
Case between Anilkumar vs Valsala et al regarding impleadment
Anilkumar is the petitioner seeking to implead additional defendants in an ongoing civil case. The court has dismissed the application as belated without valid reasons.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS. 877/2024
Case between Ramla Beevi vs Sulfikkar regarding realisation of money
Ramla Beevi has filed a suit against Sulfikkar for the recovery of Rs 2,29,500 along with interest. She claims that Sulfikkar borrowed money from her, and despite requests, he has not returned it.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS. 773/2024
Case between C. Baburajan Pillai vs Nair Service Society et al regarding interim injunction and election conduct.
C. Baburajan Pillai filed an application for an interim injunction against Nair Service Society and others regarding the conduct of elections and alleged illegal appointments of an adhoc committee. The case involves disputes over the administration of the Taluk Union.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS. 1085/2023
Case between Kulsam Beevi vs Kamarudeen et al regarding advancing the case.
Kulsam Beevi filed a petition to advance the case against Kamarudeen and others. The petition was heard in court.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. 659/2024
Case between Bhadradasaru vs Vijayan Pillai et al regarding Injunction
Bhadradasaru, the petitioner, is seeking an injunction against Vijayan Pillai and others who claim rights over the Sree Nagaraja Temple, which he alleges is part of his family's property. The respondents dispute this claim, asserting the temple is on government land.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS. 963/2023
Case between Moly Kutty vs Sajitha et al regarding Temporary Injunction
Moly Kutty filed a petition for a Temporary Injunction against Sajitha and Vidhesh regarding an illegally constructed kitchen shed that causes health hazards due to smoke and foul smell. The defendants reside next to the plaintiff and have constructed the shed without permission, prompting the plaintiff to seek court intervention.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.1107/2016
Case between Mohanan vs Mani et al regarding acceptance of documents
The case involves a petition filed by the defendants for accepting certain documents. The matter was heard and decided by the court on 08/04/2025.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS. 167/2025
Case between Goutham Krishna vs Santhosh Kumar et al regarding Temporary Injunction
The petitioner, Goutham Krishna, seeks a temporary injunction to prevent the defendants from obstructing access to a pathway serving their property. The defendants contest these claims, asserting their rights to the same pathway.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.915/2024
Case between K.Vasanthakumaran vs Mohanan regarding Temporary Injunction
K.Vasanthakumaran, the plaintiff, is seeking a temporary injunction against Mohanan, the defendant, to prevent obstruction of access to his property. The plaintiff claims rights over a pathway leading to the kitchen of his house, while the defendant contests the ownership of the property.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS. 857/2024
Case between P.Vilasini et al vs Nirmala et al regarding injunction order
The Petitioners/Plaintiffs, P.Vilasini and P.Vinodini, filed a petition to advance and extend the injunction order. The court dismissed the application after finding the injunction order to be absolute.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS. 115/2025
Case between Smt.Bishi Mathew vs Subrahmanian @ Supran et al regarding advance posting of case and interim injunction
Smt. Bishi Mathew, a retired teacher, is the plaintiff seeking to advance the hearing of her case for an interim injunction. The respondents, Subrahmanian @ Supran and Suvarna, have not filed any objections.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.579/2012
Case between Anil Kumar vs Valsala et al regarding amendment of plaint for fixation of boundary of temple property
Anil Kumar, the petitioner, seeks to amend the plaint to fix the northern boundary of a temple property as per an old survey plan. The respondents, Valsala and others, object to this amendment, claiming it is based on a false report.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS. 749/2015
Case between Dakshayani, K.C. et al vs State of Kerala regarding reopening the evidence.
This case involves a petition filed by the plaintiffs seeking to reopen evidence. The State of Kerala is the defendant represented by the Secretary of the Revenue Department.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. 137/2019
Case between Gopakumar et al vs Babu Balakrishna Panicker et al regarding mandatory injunction for removal of obstructions.
Gopakumar and Geethakumari, the plaintiffs, filed a suit against Babu Balakrishna Panicker and Preetha, the defendants, regarding the alleged obstruction of a pathway. The defendants sought an interim mandatory injunction to remove these obstructions as they impeded access to their property.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS.937/2013
Case between Radhamani Amma et al vs Kerala State et al regarding declaring the right of easement and for permanent prohibitory injunction.
Radhamani Amma and other plaintiffs filed a suit against the Kerala State and others to declare their right of easement over a property and seek a permanent prohibitory injunction. The case involves multiple petitions for re-opening evidence and appointing a commission advocate.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS. 425/2024
Case between Dr. Geethakumari vs Pradeepkumar.P regarding lifting of attachment
The petitioner, Pradeepkumar.P, is seeking to lift the attachment on his property in a suit filed by Dr. Geethakumari for recovery of money. The case involves the petitioner providing security to satisfy the potential decree in favor of the plaintiff.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS. 142/2016
Case between Mohanan et al vs Santha et al regarding EA in EP in OS
This case involves petitioners Mohanan and others against respondents Santha and others regarding execution proceedings. The petition was heard by the court after being filed under the civil procedure code.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS. 176/2018
Case between M.I.Alexander Panicker et al vs Balakrishna Pillai et al regarding partition of property
The case involves a partition suit filed by M.I.Alexander Panicker on behalf of the legal heirs of Gopala Pillai against the legal heirs of Paramu Pillai and Nani Amma. The petitioner seeks to review an order related to the cross-examination of a witness.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS. 291/2024
Case between Najitha.S vs Naushad et al regarding Temporary Injunction
The case involves Najitha.S as the plaintiff seeking a temporary injunction against Naushad and others regarding property usage and construction rights. The dispute centers on the peaceful enjoyment of certain amenities situated on the property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. 937/2013
Case between Radhamani Amma et al vs Kerala State et al regarding review of order in IA 3/2025 and IA 4/2025
The plaintiffs, led by Radhamani Amma, are seeking to review a previous order that dismissed their petitions for reopening evidence related to easement rights on a disputed property. They argue that the dismissal has denied them a fair opportunity to present essential evidence and has led to a miscarriage of justice.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. 217/2025
Case between Anil.B vs Prathap.R.S regarding conditional attachment before judgment
Anil.B filed a petition for conditional attachment against Prathap.R.S due to non-payment of a cheque amounting to Rs.7 lakhs. The plaintiff claims the defendant failed to pay despite multiple agreements and promises.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won