Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS. 615/2025

Case between Kiran Krishna vs S.D. Ajith Kumar regarding Temporary Injunction

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Judge
Smt. Ragi.S.
Order Date
2025-10-14
Duration
approximately-1 year 2 months 17 days
Case Code No.
615
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Kiran Krishna, the plaintiff, seeks a temporary injunction against S.D. Ajith Kumar, the defendant, who cancelled her booking for a wedding reception at a temple auditorium. The case revolves around the plaintiff's efforts to secure the venue for her marriage reception scheduled for January 3, 2026.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court granted the plaintiff's request for a temporary injunction against the defendant, restraining them from cancelling the confirmed booking for the wedding reception.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Temporary injunction restraining the defendant from cancelling or re allotting the plaintiff’s booking.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court granted the plaintiff's request for a temporary injunction against the defendant, restraining them from cancelling the confirmed booking for the wedding reception.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff established a prima facie case for her booking of the auditorium and demonstrated that the cancellation was unilateral and without legal justification.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
The A1 receipt produced by the plaintiff prima facie establishes the advance booking of the Maruthady Sree Devi Temple Trust Auditorium on 22/08/2024. There is no material to show that the said booking was ever lawfully cancelled prior to the reallotment.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the petition is allowed as follows: The defendant, his men, agents, and anybody claiming through him are restrained by an order of temporary injunction from cancelling, obstructing, interfering with, or re allotting the plaintiff’s confirmed booking of Maruthady Sree Devi Temple Trust Auditorium on 22/08/2025 for the marriage reception on 03/01/2026.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Kiran Krishna
Party Age
24
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
S.D. Ajith Kumar
Relation
The Secretary, Maruthady Sree Devi Temple Trust
Plaintiffs Documents
Rent receipt of Sadyalaya, Complaints to police authorities, Event Agreement with M/s Hadhi Events.
Defendants Documents
Kara Devaswam Auditorium Receipt, Notice addressed to plaintiff.

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
K. Satheesan Cherumood
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
A. Omanakuttan
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
John George.M
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Temporary Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Seeking an order of temporary injunction restraining the defendant from cancelling the booking.
Evidence:
The plaintiff has therefore made out a prima facie case, and the balance of convenience and irreparable injury both lie in favour of the plaintiff.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Photocopy of rent receipt showing advance booking of the auditorium.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Complaint
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Photocopy of complaint given to SHO Sakthikulangara P.S.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Receipt issued from Sakthikulangara P.S.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Complaint
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Copy of complaint to the City Police Commissioner, Kollam.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Receipt issued from City Police Commissioner, Kollam.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Event Management Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Copy of event agreement with M/s Hadhi Events.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Receipt
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Kara Devaswam Auditorium receipt evidencing a booking related to the case.
Reference:
Ext.B1
Document Type: Notice
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Notice addressed to the plaintiff regarding the cancellation.
Reference:
Ext.B2

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Injunction and Access Rights
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Cancellation of booking
Case Code
OS.
Case Code Year
2025

Quick Facts

Location
Kollam
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Case Filed
Fri, 08/22/2025 - 12:00
Case Closed
From
Mon, 09/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 10/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Temple Trust

Similar Cases

Case between Yesudasan vs Jincy et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
Munsiff Court
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Meloot Sree Durga Padmavathy Devi Temple et al vs Biju Panicker et al regarding Temporary Injunction
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Raveendran Pillai et al vs Kerala State et al regarding injunction.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Suresh Kumar.S. vs Narayana Pillai et al regarding Permanent Prohibitory Injunction
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Saneer et al vs Sijo Mary regarding discharge of temporary injunction.
Additional Munsiff Court, Kollam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won