Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS. No. 237/2022

Case between Suresh Kumar.S. vs Narayana Pillai et al regarding Permanent Prohibitory Injunction

Court
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Judge
Smt. Ragi.S.
Order Date
2025-01-16
Duration
approximately-2 years 1 month
Case Closed
Thu, 01/16/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiffs, Suresh Kumar.S. and Bindu Lekha, are seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants, Narayana Pillai and Madhusudhanan Pillai, to prevent them from interfering with the construction of boundary walls on their property. The plaintiffs assert that they are the rightful owners of the property and have faced disturbances from the defendants.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court ruled in favor of the plaintiffs, granting them a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants. The defendants were restrained from trespassing and interfering with the construction of boundary walls on the plaintiffs' property.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Permanent prohibitory injunction restraining the defendants from interfering with the boundary wall construction.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court ruled in favor of the plaintiffs, granting them a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants. The defendants were restrained from trespassing and interfering with the construction of boundary walls on the plaintiffs' property.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiffs provided sufficient evidence to prove their ownership and the defendants' lack of rights over the property.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiffs provided sufficient evidence to prove their ownership and the defendants' lack of rights over the property.
Supporting Evidence
Ext. A1, Sale deed No. 2573/2009 dated 02/12/2009, Ext. A2 Tax receipts shows that the plaintiffs are the absolute owner in possession of plaint schedule property and they are remitting land tax for the same.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed with costs as follows: i. The defendants and their men are permanently restrained from trespassing into the plaint schedule property and from preventing the construction of boundary walls at the south-western boundaries of the plaint schedule property.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Suresh Kumar.S.
Party Age
54
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Bindu Lekha
Party Age
50
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Narayana Pillai
Party Age
63
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Madhusudhanan Pillai
Party Age
68
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Certified copy of Sale Deed No. 2573/09 of Kollam S.R.O., Land Tax Receipt issued from Kollam East Village.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Chirakkarathazham S.Suresh Kumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Jermina.J
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sibilal.S
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. T.R.Vinod
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Permanent Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiffs are granted a permanent prohibitory injunction restraining the defendants from various disturbances related to the plaint schedule property.
Evidence:
The defendants and their men are permanently restrained from trespassing into the plaint schedule property and from preventing the construction of boundary walls at the south-western boundaries of the plaint schedule property.
Relief Type: Costs
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiffs are entitled to realise the costs of the suit from the defendants.
Evidence:
Plaintiffs are also entitled to realise the costs of the suit from the defendant.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Sale deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Proves the plaintiffs are the absolute owner in possession of the plaint schedule property.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Tax receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Shows that the plaintiffs are remitting land tax for the plaint schedule property.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Commission Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Prepared by the Advocate Commissioner confirming the boundaries of the plaint schedule property.
Reference:
Ext.C1 series

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Injunction and Access Rights
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Suresh Kumar.S. vs Narayana Pillai et al regarding Permanent Prohibitory Injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Suresh Kumar.S. vs Narayana Pillai et al regarding Permanent Prohibitory Injunction

Quick Facts

Location
Kollam
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Case Filed
Sat, 01/01/2022 - 12:00
Case Closed
Thu, 01/16/2025 - 12:00
From
Wed, 01/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 02/28/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
95%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Yesudasan vs Jincy et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Munsiff Court, Kollam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Yesudasan vs Jincy et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
Munsiff Court
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Meloot Sree Durga Padmavathy Devi Temple et al vs Biju Panicker et al regarding Temporary Injunction
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Raveendran Pillai et al vs Kerala State et al regarding injunction.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Saneer et al vs Sijo Mary regarding discharge of temporary injunction.
Additional Munsiff Court, Kollam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won