Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS. No. 828/2018

Case between Vishnu vs N. Muthulakshmi et al regarding Permanent Prohibitory Injunction

Court
The Court of the Munsiff, Kollam
Judge
Smt. Ragi.S.
Order Date
2025-08-23
Duration
approximately-6 years 11 months
Case Closed
Sat, 08/23/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Vishnu filed a suit against N. Muthulakshmi and Ramdas Potty for a permanent prohibitory injunction to restrain the defendants from evicting him from the rented property. The plaintiff claimed that the defendants threatened him to vacate the premises unlawfully.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the suit for permanent prohibitory injunction, ruling in favor of the defendants. The plaintiff failed to establish his right to the injunction sought.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the suit for permanent prohibitory injunction, ruling in favor of the defendants. The plaintiff failed to establish his right to the injunction sought.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff failed to substantiate his claim with sufficient evidence and did not demonstrate lawful possession.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff failed to substantiate his claim with sufficient evidence and did not demonstrate lawful possession.
Supporting Evidence
The plaintiff has failed to establish his right for the remedy sought for. Therefore, he cannot seek the discretionary relief of injunction restraining the defendants from trespassing into the plaint schedule property and from forcibly evicting the plaintiff therefrom.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is dismissed with costs of 1st defendant.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Vishnu
Party Age
29
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
N. Muthulakshmi
Party Age
63
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Ramdas Potty
Party Age
52
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
City Office of Sivasena, Kollam
Relation
Represented by
Plaintiffs Documents
Copy of Rent Deed, Letter of Hindu Sena Kerala State Committee, Minutes of Hindu Sena Executive Committee, Kollam.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
R.Ramesh Kumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Lekha Vamadevan
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Haripriya
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Latheesh R.Prasad
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
K.P.Gopalakrishna Pillai
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Permanent Injunction
Outcome: Refused
Description:
The plaintiff sought a permanent prohibitory injunction restraining the defendants from trespassing and evicting him from the plaint schedule property.
Evidence:
Therefore, he cannot seek the discretionary relief of injunction restraining the defendants from trespassing into the plaint schedule property and from forcibly evicting the plaintiff there from and also from committing any waste therein.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Rent Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The plaintiff executed a rent deed in favour of the 1st defendant for occupying the upper floor of the plaint schedule property.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Letter
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
A letter from the Hindu Sena Kerala State Committee relevant to the case.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Minutes
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Minutes of a meeting from the Hindu Sena Executive Committee, Kollam.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Commission Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Court's commission report prepared and submitted by Advocate Commissioner Remya.S.
Reference:
Ext.C1
Document Type: Mahazar
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Mahazar prepared and submitted by Advocate Commissioner Remya.S.
Reference:
Ext.C1(a)

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Injunction and Access Rights
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Vishnu vs N. Muthulakshmi et al regarding Permanent Prohibitory Injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Vishnu vs N. Muthulakshmi et al regarding Permanent Prohibitory Injunction

Quick Facts

Location
Kollam
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Case Filed
Fri, 09/28/2018 - 12:00
Case Closed
Sat, 08/23/2025 - 12:00
From
Tue, 07/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 08/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Charitable Organization

Similar Cases

Case between Yesudasan vs Jincy et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
Munsiff Court
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Meloot Sree Durga Padmavathy Devi Temple et al vs Biju Panicker et al regarding Temporary Injunction
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Raveendran Pillai et al vs Kerala State et al regarding injunction.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Suresh Kumar.S. vs Narayana Pillai et al regarding Permanent Prohibitory Injunction
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Saneer et al vs Sijo Mary regarding discharge of temporary injunction.
Additional Munsiff Court, Kollam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won