Similar Cases
Based on: MA (Arbitration) No. 16/2024 — Case between M/s. Shriram Finance Limited vs Shafil Mohammed et al regarding Arbitration proceedings.
48 matching cases found, ranked by shared legal context
M.A(Arb). No.72/2025
Case between Manapuram Finance Ltd vs Ahammed Shamnas N A et al regarding petition under section 9 of the Arbitration and conciliation Act 1996
Manapuram Finance Ltd has filed a petition against Ahammed Shamnas N A and Ayisha B M under section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act. The respondents did not appear in court.
Arbitration
Dismissed
M.A(Arb). No.73/2025
Case between Manappuram Finance Ltd vs Rahim Muliyar Povval et al regarding Arbitration and Conciliation
Manappuram Finance Ltd filed a petition under section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 against Rahim Muliyar Povval and others. The case is about seeking arbitration-related relief.
Arbitration
Defendant Won
M.A(Arb). No.64/2025
Case between M/s. Cholamandalam Investment and Finance Company Limited vs Jose Traders et al regarding Arbitration and conciliation
M/s. Cholamandalam Investment and Finance Company Limited filed a petition against Jose Traders and Gebi under section 9(ii) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996. The respondents were set ex parte due to their absence.
Arbitration
Plaintiff Won
MA (Arbitration) No.74/2025
Case between Shriram Finance Limited vs Dinu P et al regarding Arbitration and Conciliation Act
Shriram Finance Limited filed a petition against Dinu P and others under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act. The court closed the proceedings after achieving the purpose of the application.
Arbitration
Plaintiff Won
MA (Arbitration) No.32/2025
Case between M/s.Shriram Finance Limited vs Muneer K.T et al regarding Arbitration application.
M/s.Shriram Finance Limited filed a petition under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act. The case involved respondents Muneer K.T and Shamsudheen.
Arbitration
Plaintiff Won
MA (Arbitration) No. 70/2025
Case between M/s. Shriram Finance Limited vs Rasheed Anapparambil Kader et al regarding Arbitration and Conciliation Act application.
M/s. Shriram Finance Limited filed a petition under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act concerning certain disputes. The petitioners were represented by their advocate, while the respondents did not appear in court.
Arbitration
Defendant Won
MA (Arbitration) No. 33/2025
Case between M/s. Shriram Finance Limited vs Latha et al regarding Arbitration
M/s. Shriram Finance Limited is the petitioner seeking relief against Latha and Subeesh. The case involves an application filed under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996.
Arbitration
Plaintiff Won
MA (Arbitration) No. 19/2024
Case between Cholmandalam Investment and Finance Co.Ltd et al vs Arjun P.R regarding Arbitration proceedings
Cholmandalam Investment and Finance Co.Ltd filed a petition against Arjun P.R under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996. The petitioner expressed an inability to trace the vehicle involved and failed to proceed with the matter as directed by the court.
Arbitration
Defendant Won
MA (Arbitration) No. 29/2025
Case between Shriram Finance Limited vs Souparnika Associates et al regarding Arbitration Application
Shriram Finance Limited filed a petition under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act concerning a dispute with Souparnika Associates and others. The matter was settled with a joint statement filed, and the court closed the proceedings.
Arbitration
Defendant Won
MA (Arbitration) No. 23/2024
Case between Shriram Finance Limited vs Jis. P. Mathew et al regarding arbitration proceedings
Shriram Finance Limited filed a petition against Jis. P. Mathew and Nirmal Joy under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act. The case involved property attachment and proceedings.
Arbitration
Plaintiff Won
MA (Arbitration) No. 21/2024
Case between Shriram Finance Limited vs Rajesh Kumar M et al regarding arbitration proceedings.
The petitioner, Shriram Finance Limited, filed the application under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act concerning arbitration proceedings against respondents Rajesh Kumar M and Rameesh Madathil. The court noted that the matter was not settled and the proceedings were subsequently closed.
Arbitration
Defendant Won
MA (Arbitration) No. 24/2025
Case between M/s. Kotak Mahindra Prime Ltd vs Sajitha V et al regarding Arbitration application.
This case involves M/s. Kotak Mahindra Prime Ltd as the petitioner and Sajitha V and Abdul Muneer P as respondents. The application was submitted under Section 9(2) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
Arbitration
Plaintiff Won
MA (Arbitration) No. 14/2025
Case between Shriram Finance Limited vs Biju N et al regarding Arbitration
Shriram Finance Limited filed an application under Section 9(ii) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996. The respondents were set exparte and the court proceeded with the hearing.
Arbitration
Plaintiff Won
MA (Arbitration) No. 17/2025
Case between Shriram Finance Limited vs Suman E et al regarding Arbitration and Conciliation act
Shriram Finance Limited filed a petition under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act against Suman E and others. The respondents were absent and set ex-parte.
Arbitration
Plaintiff Won
MA (Arbitration) No.8/2025
Case between Shriram Finance Limited vs Abilash Balan et al regarding Arbitration application
Shriram Finance Limited filed a petition under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act against Abilash Balan and others. The court dealt with the application and ultimately closed the proceedings.
Arbitration
Plaintiff Won
CMA (Arbitration) No.12/2024
Case between Shriram Finance Limited vs Neethu K et al regarding Arbitration application
Shriram Finance Limited filed a petition under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act seeking relief in a dispute involving the respondents Neethu K, Sathyachandran K, and Krishnan Kutty. The court conducted a hearing on the application.
Arbitration
MA (Arbitration) No. 27/2024
Case between M/s. Kotak Mahindra Prime Ltd vs Naina Laiju et al regarding Arbitration and Conciliation act
M/s. Kotak Mahindra Prime Ltd has filed a petition under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act against Naina Laiju and Laiju M regarding arbitration proceedings. The court noted that the respondents were absent and no representation was made.
Arbitration
Defendant Won
MA (Arbitration) No. 4/2024
Case between M/s. Shriram Finance Limited vs Abdul Gafoor Chenikandiyil et al regarding Arbitration matters
The case involves M/s. Shriram Finance Limited as the petitioner and Abdul Gafoor Chenikandiyil along with others as respondents. The petition was filed under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act regarding certain arbitration matters.
Arbitration
Plaintiff Won
Arbitration Case No.01/2023
Case between Manappuram Chits India Ltd vs Prabeesh PK et al regarding mediation settlement
Manappuram Chits India Ltd is the petitioner represented by Mr. Suhaib T. The respondents are Prabeesh PK and Rakesh K. The matter was settled in mediation with a payment made by the petitioner.
Arbitration
Plaintiff Won
C.S. No. 20/2025
Case between M/s. Medimall Kunnamangalam LLP vs Dr. Sujith A.K regarding petition filed under Order 9 Rule 13, r/w section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure.
This case involves Dr. Sujith A.K as the petitioner/defendant and M/s. Medimall Kunnamangalam LLP as the respondent/plaintiff. The petition was filed for dismissal of a previous order due to the absence of representation.
Commercial Case
Defendant Won
Commercial Suit. No. 14/2025
Case between HT & LT. Kozhikode vs Shapoorji Pallonji and Company Private Limited et al regarding settlement and dismissal.
HT & LT. Kozhikode is the plaintiff represented by K.K Paveen Kumar. The defendants include Shapoorji Pallonji and Company Private Limited and other individuals related to the case. The matter was settled between the parties and the suit was dismissed as not pressed.
Commercial Suit
Dismissed
Commercial Suit No.8/2024
Case between Murshid Panginikkadan vs Rahul Sadasivan et al regarding a commercial dispute.
Murshid Panginikkadan and Abdul Nigash Parvesh T.T are the plaintiffs in a commercial dispute against Rahul Sadasivan and Y NOT Studios represented by Chakravarthy Ramachandran. The case was heard in the II Addl. Commercial Court of Kozhikode.
Commercial Suit
Defendant Won
EP. 361/2022
Case between Shriram Tansport Finance Co.Ltd vs Sameer et al regarding warrant issuance.
Shriram Transport Finance Co.Ltd filed a petition against Sameer and others regarding warrant issuance. The respondents did not appear, resulting in the case being dismissed for default.
Execution Petition
Defendant Won
Commercial Suit No.702/2021
Case between Moidu’s Medicate Private Limited vs Wipro GE Health Care Private Limited regarding compensation for breach of contract.
Moidu’s Medicate Private Limited, represented by its Medical Director, is suing Wipro GE Health Care Private Limited for failing to deliver and install an MRI machine within the agreed timeline. The plaintiff claims to have sustained financial losses due to this delay.
Commercial Suit
Defendant Won
EP. 38/2025 in CS. 471/2021
Case between M/s. Nirmal Associates vs M/s. Bajaj Appliances Limited et al regarding execution petition
M/s. Nirmal Associates filed a petition under section 37 of the Code of Civil Procedure for execution against M/s. Bajaj Appliances Limited and its directors. The respondents did not enter an appearance during the hearing.
Execution Petition
Plaintiff Won
M.A(Arb). No.65/2025
Case between M/s. Cholamandalam Investment and Finance Co.Ltd vs Gireesh Parakkal Meethal regarding petition under section 9(ii) of the Arbitration and conciliation Act 1996
M/s. Cholamandalam Investment and Finance Co.Ltd filed a petition against Gireesh Parakkal Meethal under the Arbitration and conciliation Act 1996. The court heard the case and closed the proceedings as the purpose of the motion was accomplished.
Arbitration
Plaintiff Won
M.A(Arb). No.71/2025
Case between M/s. Cholamandalam Investment & Finance Co. Ltd vs Bijoy Babu N et al regarding Arbitration and conciliation Act 1996
M/s. Cholamandalam Investment & Finance Co. Ltd filed a petition against Bijoy Babu N and Reena N under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act for relief. The respondents were set ex parte and absent during the hearing.
Arbitration
Plaintiff Won
M.A(Arb). No.66/2025
Case between M/s. Shriram Finance Limited et al vs Muhammed Nisam P et al regarding arbitration matter.
The case involves M/s. Shriram Finance Limited filing a petition under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act against Muhammed Nisam P and others. The proceedings have been closed as the respondents were set exparte.
Arbitration
Plaintiff Won
MA (Arbitration) No.58/2025
Case between M/s. Tata Capital Limited vs Muhammed Jabbar K.M regarding petition under Section 9(ii) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act.
M/s. Tata Capital Limited filed a petition against Muhammed Jabbar K.M under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act. The petitioner stated that they could not trace the vehicle despite earnest efforts.
Arbitration
Plaintiff Won
MA (Arbitration) No.43/2025
Case between M/s. Cholamandalam Investment & Finance Co.Ltd vs Mansoor A.K et al regarding Arbitration and Conciliation Act
M/s. Cholamandalam Investment & Finance Co.Ltd filed a petition under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act. The case involves the tracing of a vehicle which could not be located.
Arbitration
Defendant Won
MA (Arbitration) No.79/2025
Case between M/s. Cholamandalam Investment & Finance Co.Ltd vs Abhilash V.P et al regarding Arbitration.
M/s. Cholamandalam Investment & Finance Co.Ltd filed a petition under Section 9(ii) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996. The respondents (Abhilash V.P, Achuthan V, and Savithri K) were called but absent, and the case proceeded ex-parte.
Arbitration
Plaintiff Won
MA (Arbitration) No.41/2025
Case between Shriram Finance Limited vs Vinoop et al regarding Arbitration proceedings
Shriram Finance Limited filed a petition against Vinoop and others under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996. The application was heard regarding mediation, with no representation from the respondents.
Arbitration
Plaintiff Won
MA (Arbitration) No.77/2025
Case between Palliyulla Kariat Abdulla Koya vs Suhaib Mathilakath Hameedmon regarding arbitration application.
Palliyulla Kariat Abdulla Koya filed a petition under Section 9(ii)(a)(c) and Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure against Suhaib Mathilakath Hameedmon. The court concluded that the purpose of the application was accomplished and closed the proceedings.
Arbitration
Plaintiff Won
MA (Arbitration) No.34/2025
Case between Shriram Finance Limited vs Muhammadali E et al regarding arbitration application
Shriram Finance Limited filed a petition under arbitration and conciliation act. The respondents include Muhammadali E and others, with the petition concerning a vehicle that couldn't be traced.
Arbitration
Plaintiff Won
MA (Arbitration) No.25/2024
Case between M/s. Kotak Mahindra Prime Ltd vs Biju M.K et al regarding Arbitration and Conciliation Act.
M/s. Kotak Mahindra Prime Ltd filed a petition under Section 9(ii) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The application was heard in the presence of the advocates for both sides.
Arbitration
Defendant Won
MA (Arbitration) No.60/2025
Case between M/s. Kotak Mahindra Prime Ltd vs Vinod M et al regarding Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996
M/s. Kotak Mahindra Prime Ltd filed a petition under Section 9(ii) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 against Vinod M and Sona Vinod M. The application was for interim relief in arbitration proceedings.
Arbitration
Plaintiff Won
MA (Arbitration) No.42/2025
Case between M/s. Hinduja Leyland Finance Ltd. vs Pribin V et al regarding arbitration proceedings.
M/s. Hinduja Leyland Finance Ltd. filed a petition under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act. The respondents, Pribin V and Pushpa, did not appear in court, leading to the case being closed.
Arbitration
Plaintiff Won
MA (Arbitration) No.37/2025
Case between M/s. Maben Nidhi Ltd vs Gaisha T.P et al regarding Petition under Section 9(ii) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
M/s. Maben Nidhi Ltd filed a petition under Section 9(ii) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 against respondents Gaisha T.P and Nidhil Ram K. The court dismissed the petition for default due to no steps taken against the second respondent.
Arbitration
Defendant Won
MA (Arbitration) No.48/2025
Case between M/s. Cholamandalam Investment & Finance Co.Ltd vs Sajith M V et al regarding arbitration proceedings.
M/s. Cholamandalam Investment & Finance Co.Ltd filed an application under Section 9(ii) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 against Sajith M V and Droupathi P.K. The court examined the commission report filed and closed the proceedings.
Arbitration
Plaintiff Won
MA (Arbitration) No.69/2025
Case between M/s. Shriram Finance Limited vs Almas Rasheed AMR Construction Pvt.Ltd et al regarding arbitration petition.
M/s. Shriram Finance Limited filed a petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 against Almas Rasheed AMR Construction Pvt.Ltd and others. The court dismissed the petition as not pressed.
Arbitration
Defendant Won
MA (Arbitration) No.27/2025
Case between M/s. Kotak Mahindra Prime Ltd vs Abdul Kerim K et al regarding Arbitration and Conciliation
M/s. Kotak Mahindra Prime Ltd filed a petition under Section 9(ii) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 against Abdul Kerim K and Asalul Hamza. The purpose of the application was accomplished and the proceedings were closed.
Arbitration
Defendant Won
MA (Arbitration) No. 51/2025
Case between M/s. Cholamandalam Investment & Finance Co. Ltd vs Shibin K.P et al regarding Arbitration and Conciliation act 1996.
M/s. Cholamandalam Investment & Finance Co. Ltd filed a petition under Section 9(ii) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 against Shibin K.P and Sivan Kollanarambath. The court conducted a hearing and closed the proceedings.
Arbitration
Plaintiff Won
MA (Arbitration) No. 38/2025
Case between M/s. Cholamandalam Investment & Finance Co. Ltd vs Ahanas R.O et al regarding arbitration petition
M/s. Cholamandalam Investment & Finance Co. Ltd filed a petition under Section 9(ii) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 against Ahanas R.O and Sulaiman R. The petition was dismissed for default due to no representation from the petitioner.
Arbitration
Defendant Won
MA (Arbitration) No. 18/2025
Case between M/s. Kotak Mahindra Prime Ltd vs Sirajudheen P regarding arbitration application
M/s. Kotak Mahindra Prime Ltd filed a petition under Section 9(ii) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 against Sirajudheen P. The respondent was set ex parte as there was no representation.
Arbitration
Plaintiff Won
MA (Arbitration) No. 52/2025
Case between M/s.Shriram Finance Limited vs P L Joshy et al regarding arbitration
M/s.Shriram Finance Limited filed a petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 against P L Joshy and others. The court dismissed the petition as noted in the hearing.
Arbitration
Defendant Won
MA (Arbitration) No. 07/2024
Case between M/s.Kotak Mahindra Prime Ltd vs Nishadali P.T regarding Arbitration application
M/s.Kotak Mahindra Prime Ltd filed a petition under Section 9(ii) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act against Nishadali P.T. The case involves an arbitration matter where the petitioner sought relief related to the arbitration process.
Arbitration
Plaintiff Won
MA (Arbitration) No. 46/2025
Case between M/s. Hinduja Leyland Finance Ltd vs IBMK Engineering EPC Private Limited et al regarding Arbitration proceedings
M/s. Hinduja Leyland Finance Ltd filed a petition under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996. The respondents were set exparte, and the petition was dismissed for default due to lack of representation.
Arbitration
Defendant Won
MA (Arbitration) No. 53/2025
Case between M/s. Cholamandalam Investment & Finance Co.Ltd vs Muhammed Shafi T.T et al regarding Arbitration.
This case involves M/s. Cholamandalam Investment & Finance Co.Ltd as the petitioner and Muhammed Shafi T.T along with his wife Noushida K.T as respondents. The petition was filed under Section 9(ii) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996.
Arbitration
Plaintiff Won