Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
Commercial Suit No.8/2024

Case between Murshid Panginikkadan vs Rahul Sadasivan et al regarding a commercial dispute.

Court
II Addl. Commercial Court/Subordinate Judge, Kozhikode
Judge
Smt. Vandana R
Order Date
2025-08-21
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Murshid Panginikkadan and Abdul Nigash Parvesh T.T are the plaintiffs in a commercial dispute against Rahul Sadasivan and Y NOT Studios represented by Chakravarthy Ramachandran. The case was heard in the II Addl. Commercial Court of Kozhikode.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court allowed IA.4/24 and the plaintiffs' request was rejected. The judgment was pronounced in open court.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Commercial Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court allowed IA.4/24 and the plaintiffs' request was rejected. The judgment was pronounced in open court.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

IA.4/24 allowed. Plaint rejected.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Murshid Panginikkadan
Party Age
26
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Abdul Nigash Parvesh T.T
Party Age
27
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Rahul Sadasivan
Party Age
36
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Y NOT Studios
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Smt.T.Sunitha
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri.Mohammed Siyad
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri.Nabeel B.A
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri Abhy John T.K
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri Sharan Shahier
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
IA.4/24 allowed.
Evidence:
IA.4/24 allowed.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Rejected
Description:
Plaint rejected.
Evidence:
Plaint rejected.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Commercial Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Commercial Court Kozhikode
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Murshid Panginikkadan vs Rahul Sadasivan et al regarding a commercial dispute.
Case Code Year
Case between Murshid Panginikkadan vs Rahul Sadasivan et al regarding a commercial dispute.

Quick Facts

Location
Kozhikode
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Commercial Court Kozhikode
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Wed, 01/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 12/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
75%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases

Case between M/s.Polaris Associates vs M/s.HSIL Ltd., The Branch Head, Consumer Business Office, M/s Somany Hone innovators Ltd. regarding realisation of money
II ADDL. COMMERCIAL COURT/SUBORDINATE JUDGE, KOZHIKODE
Commercial Suit Defendant Won
Case between Moidu’s Medicate Private Limited vs Wipro GE Health Care Private Limited regarding compensation for breach of contract.
Commercial Court III
Commercial Suit Defendant Won
Case between HT & LT. Kozhikode vs Shapoorji Pallonji and Company Private Limited et al regarding settlement and dismissal.
Commercial Court of Kozhikode
Commercial Suit Dismissed
Case between M/s. Manuelsons Hotel Pvt Ltd vs District Collector, Kozhikode & State of Kerala regarding realization of amount.
IN THE COURT OF COMMERCIAL/III ADDL. SUB JUDGE, KOZHIKODE
Commercial Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s.Eon Infrastructures and Developers Pvt. Ltd vs M/s.White Fort Constructions and Engineers Pvt. Ltd et al regarding realisation of money
Commercial Court/ II Addl. Subordinate Judge, Kozhikode
Commercial Suit Plaintiff Won