Case Summary
Palliyulla Kariat Abdulla Koya filed a petition under Section 9(ii)(a)(c) and Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure against Suhaib Mathilakath Hameedmon. The court concluded that the purpose of the application was accomplished and closed the proceedings.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Arbitration
Final Judgment
No
The court found that the purpose of the petition was achieved.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The purpose of the application was accomplished.
The purpose of the application was accomplished.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The purpose of the application was accomplished.
The purpose of the application was accomplished.
Supporting Evidence
Purpose of MA accomplished.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence, proceedings closed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Palliyulla Kariat Abdulla Koya
- Party Age
- 68
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Suhaib Mathilakath Hameedmon
- Party Age
- 39
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Razal Rahiman
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri. G Manoharlal
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Amrutha V.P
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Arbitration
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Commercial Court Kozhikode
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Palliyulla Kariat Abdulla Koya vs Suhaib Mathilakath Hameedmon regarding arbitration application.
Case Code Year
Case between Palliyulla Kariat Abdulla Koya vs Suhaib Mathilakath Hameedmon regarding arbitration application.