Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
M.A(Arb). No.65/2025

Case between M/s. Cholamandalam Investment and Finance Co.Ltd vs Gireesh Parakkal Meethal regarding petition under section 9(ii) of the Arbitration and conciliation Act 1996

Court
Commercial Court of Kozhikode
Judge
Smt. Leena Rasheed
Order Date
2025-11-20
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

M/s. Cholamandalam Investment and Finance Co.Ltd filed a petition against Gireesh Parakkal Meethal under the Arbitration and conciliation Act 1996. The court heard the case and closed the proceedings as the purpose of the motion was accomplished.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court closed the proceedings as the purpose of the motion was accomplished.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Arbitration
Final Judgment
No
The court closed the proceedings as the purpose of the motion was accomplished.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Supporting Evidence
Reason not clearly mentioned.

Judgment Evidence:

The purpose of MA accomplished, hence, proceedings closed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
M/s. Cholamandalam Investment and Finance Co.Ltd
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Gireesh Parakkal Meethal
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Sreekanth Soman
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. Chithranath C
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Commission Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
The commission report was filed, and the purpose of the MA was accomplished.
Reference:

Case Classification

Case Type
Arbitration
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Commercial Court Kozhikode
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between M/s. Cholamandalam Investment and Finance Co.Ltd vs Gireesh Parakkal Meethal regarding petition under section 9(ii) of the Arbitration and conciliation Act 1996
Case Code Year
Case between M/s. Cholamandalam Investment and Finance Co.Ltd vs Gireesh Parakkal Meethal regarding petition under section 9(ii) of the Arbitration and conciliation Act 1996

Quick Facts

Location
Kozhikode
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Commercial Court Kozhikode
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Wed, 01/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 12/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
75%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between M/s. Shriram Finance Limited et al vs Muhammed Nisam P et al regarding arbitration matter.
COMMERCIAL COURT OF KOZHIKODE
Arbitration Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s. Cholamandalam Investment and Finance Company Limited vs Jose Traders et al regarding Arbitration and conciliation
Commercial Court of Kozhikode
Arbitration Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s. Cholamandalam Investment & Finance Co. Ltd vs Bijoy Babu N et al regarding Arbitration and conciliation Act 1996
COMMERCIAL COURT OF KOZHIKODE
Arbitration Plaintiff Won
Case between Manappuram Finance Ltd vs Rahim Muliyar Povval et al regarding Arbitration and Conciliation
COURT OF THE COMMERCIAL JUDGE/SUBORDINATE JUDGE OF KOZHIKODE
Arbitration Defendant Won
Case between Manapuram Finance Ltd vs Ahammed Shamnas N A et al regarding petition under section 9 of the Arbitration and conciliation Act 1996
COURT OF THE COMMERCIAL JUDGE/SUBORDINATE JUDGE OF KOZHIKODE
Arbitration Dismissed