Case Summary
M/s. Cholamandalam Investment and Finance Company Limited filed a petition against Jose Traders and Gebi under section 9(ii) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996. The respondents were set ex parte due to their absence.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Property attached
Case Type
Arbitration
Final Judgment
No
The court ordered that the property be attached, and since the first respondent was served but absent, the proceedings were closed.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The petition was duly filed and the purpose of the application was accomplished.
The petition was duly filed and the purpose of the application was accomplished.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The petition was duly filed and the purpose of the application was accomplished.
The petition was duly filed and the purpose of the application was accomplished.
Supporting Evidence
The purpose of MA accomplished.
Judgment Evidence:
Property attached. R1 served, called, absent. No representation. Already set exparte. Purpose of MA accomplished. Hence, proceedings closed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- M/s. Cholamandalam Investment and Finance Company Limited
- Relation
- Represented by
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Jose Traders
- Party Age
- 47
- Relation
- Rep.by Proprietor
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Gebi
- Party Age
- 45
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Noushad Kallada
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Arbitration
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Commercial Court Kozhikode
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between M/s. Cholamandalam Investment and Finance Company Limited vs Jose Traders et al regarding Arbitration and conciliation
Case Code Year
Case between M/s. Cholamandalam Investment and Finance Company Limited vs Jose Traders et al regarding Arbitration and conciliation