Case Summary
M/s. Kotak Mahindra Prime Ltd filed a petition under Section 9(ii) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 against Vinod M and Sona Vinod M. The application was for interim relief in arbitration proceedings.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Arbitration
Final Judgment
No
The proceedings for the petition filed under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act have been closed as the purpose was accomplished.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Hence, proceedings closed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- M/s. Kotak Mahindra Prime Ltd
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Mri. Ragesh G.K
- Party Age
- 35
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Vinod M
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sona Vinod M
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. M. Shahier Singh
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Anil Viswanath
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Purpose of MA accomplished.
Evidence:
Purpose of MA accomplished. Hence, proceedings closed.
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Commission Report
Submitted By:
Court
Relevance:
Commission report filed was relevant for the proceedings.
Reference:
Case Classification
Case Type
Arbitration
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Commercial Court Kozhikode
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between M/s. Kotak Mahindra Prime Ltd vs Vinod M et al regarding Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996
Case Code Year
Case between M/s. Kotak Mahindra Prime Ltd vs Vinod M et al regarding Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996