Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
MA (Arbitration) No.58/2025

Case between M/s. Tata Capital Limited vs Muhammed Jabbar K.M regarding petition under Section 9(ii) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act.

Court
COMMERCIAL COURT OF KOZHIKODE
Judge
Smt. Leena Rasheed
Order Date
2025-10-27
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

M/s. Tata Capital Limited filed a petition against Muhammed Jabbar K.M under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act. The petitioner stated that they could not trace the vehicle despite earnest efforts.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court closed the petition with liberty to revive it in the future if the vehicle is traced out.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Arbitration
Final Judgment
No
The court closed the petition with liberty to revive it in the future if the vehicle is traced out.
Why Plaintiff Won:
No objection filed so far and efforts to trace the vehicle were acknowledged.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
No objection filed so far and efforts to trace the vehicle were acknowledged.
Supporting Evidence
Petitioner submitted that inspite of earnest efforts, the vehicle could not be traced out.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence petition stands closed with liberty to revive as and when the vehicle is traced out.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
M/s. Tata Capital Limited
Party Age
36
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Muhammed Jabbar K.M
Party Age
48
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Noushad Kallada
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. Rajesh E
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Closed
Description:
Petition stands closed with liberty to revive as and when the vehicle is traced out.
Evidence:
Hence petition stands closed with liberty to revive as and when the vehicle is traced out.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Arbitration
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Commercial Court Kozhikode
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between M/s. Tata Capital Limited vs Muhammed Jabbar K.M regarding petition under Section 9(ii) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act.
Case Code Year
Case between M/s. Tata Capital Limited vs Muhammed Jabbar K.M regarding petition under Section 9(ii) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act.

Quick Facts

Location
Kozhikode
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Commercial Court Kozhikode
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Wed, 01/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 12/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between M/s. Cholamandalam Investment and Finance Co.Ltd vs Gireesh Parakkal Meethal regarding petition under section 9(ii) of the Arbitration and conciliation Act 1996
Commercial Court of Kozhikode
Arbitration Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s. Cholamandalam Investment and Finance Company Limited vs Jose Traders et al regarding Arbitration and conciliation
Commercial Court of Kozhikode
Arbitration Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s. Cholamandalam Investment & Finance Co. Ltd vs Bijoy Babu N et al regarding Arbitration and conciliation Act 1996
COMMERCIAL COURT OF KOZHIKODE
Arbitration Plaintiff Won
Case between Manappuram Finance Ltd vs Rahim Muliyar Povval et al regarding Arbitration and Conciliation
COURT OF THE COMMERCIAL JUDGE/SUBORDINATE JUDGE OF KOZHIKODE
Arbitration Defendant Won
Case between Manapuram Finance Ltd vs Ahammed Shamnas N A et al regarding petition under section 9 of the Arbitration and conciliation Act 1996
COURT OF THE COMMERCIAL JUDGE/SUBORDINATE JUDGE OF KOZHIKODE
Arbitration Dismissed