Case Summary
M/s. Maben Nidhi Ltd filed a petition under Section 9(ii) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 against respondents Gaisha T.P and Nidhil Ram K. The court dismissed the petition for default due to no steps taken against the second respondent.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Arbitration
Final Judgment
No
The court ordered the dismissal of the petition for default due to no steps taken against the second respondent.
Key Reasoning:
The second respondent was not served as required for the petition to proceed.
The second respondent was not served as required for the petition to proceed.
Why Defendant Won:
The second respondent was not served as required for the petition to proceed.
The second respondent was not served as required for the petition to proceed.
Supporting Evidence
No steps taken against R2.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence, Petition dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- M/s. Maben Nidhi Ltd
- Relation
- Represented by
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Gaisha T.P
- Party Age
- 60
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Nidhil Ram K
- Party Age
- 31
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. M. Shahier Singh
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
Petition dismissed for default.
Evidence:
No steps taken against R2. Hence, Petition dismissed for default.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Arbitration
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Commercial Court Kozhikode
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between M/s. Maben Nidhi Ltd vs Gaisha T.P et al regarding Petition under Section 9(ii) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
Case Code Year
Case between M/s. Maben Nidhi Ltd vs Gaisha T.P et al regarding Petition under Section 9(ii) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.