Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
EP. 38/2025 in CS. 471/2021

Case between M/s. Nirmal Associates vs M/s. Bajaj Appliances Limited et al regarding execution petition

Court
Commercial Court, Kozhikode
Judge
Smt. Leena Rasheed
Order Date
2025-02-15
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

M/s. Nirmal Associates filed a petition under section 37 of the Code of Civil Procedure for execution against M/s. Bajaj Appliances Limited and its directors. The respondents did not enter an appearance during the hearing.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The petition was allowed, and the execution petition was transmitted to the District Judge, North West District, New Delhi.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Execution Petition
Final Judgment
No
The petition was allowed, and the execution petition was transmitted to the District Judge, North West District, New Delhi.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The petition was allowed as there was no opposition from the respondents.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The petition was allowed as there was no opposition from the respondents.
Supporting Evidence
The petition was allowed as there was no appearance from the respondents.

Judgment Evidence:

Heard. Petition allowed. Transmit the EP for execution to District Judge, North West District, New Delhi.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
M/s. Nirmal Associates
Party Age
64
Relation
Rep by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
M/s. Bajaj Appliances Limited
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Manne Srinivas Rao
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Naveen Bajaj
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Bansi Dhar Bajaj
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Prince Bajaj
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Ahammed Kutty Puthalath
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Petition allowed and EP transmitted for execution.
Evidence:
Petition allowed. Transmit the EP for execution to District Judge, North West District, New Delhi.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Execution Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Commercial Court Kozhikode
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between M/s. Nirmal Associates vs M/s. Bajaj Appliances Limited et al regarding execution petition
Case Code Year
Case between M/s. Nirmal Associates vs M/s. Bajaj Appliances Limited et al regarding execution petition

Quick Facts

Location
Kozhikode
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Commercial Court Kozhikode
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Wed, 01/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 12/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases

Case between Shriram Tansport Finance Co.Ltd vs Sameer et al regarding warrant issuance.
COMMERCIAL/III ADDL. SUB JUDGE, KOZHIKODE
Execution Petition Defendant Won
Case between Kasthoorba Mahila Samajam vs Dhanyasree K regarding delivery of possession.
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF – I
Execution Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between K Babu vs Mariya et al regarding execution petition
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF – I
Execution Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Adarsh.P vs 1Star Health Allied Insurance Co.Ltd regarding execution petition.
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF – I, KOZHIKODE
Execution Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Punchappadam Pravasi Janakeeya Samithi vs Fasaludheen B regarding execution of decree.
Court of the Principal Munsiff – I
Execution Petition Plaintiff Won