Case Summary
Shriram Transport Finance Co.Ltd filed a petition against Sameer and others regarding warrant issuance. The respondents did not appear, resulting in the case being dismissed for default.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Execution Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court found that no warrant expense was paid by the respondents, leading to the dismissal of the execution petition for default.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Hence E.P is dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Shriram Tansport Finance Co.Ltd
- Relation
- Represented by
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sameer
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Rajeesh.P
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Nusarath
- Relation
- D/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Anil.G
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
E.P is dismissed for default due to no warrant expense paid.
Evidence:
No warrant expense was paid. Hence no warrant was issued. Inspite of several chances given no warrant expense paid. Hence E.P is dismissed for default.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Execution Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Commercial Court Kozhikode
Common Reasons
Case Code
EP.
Case Code Year
2022