Case Summary
M/s. Kotak Mahindra Prime Ltd filed a petition under Section 9(ii) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The application was heard in the presence of the advocates for both sides.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Arbitration
Final Judgment
No
The petition was dismissed for default as the petitioner was absent and no representation was made.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Petitioner absent. No representation. Petition dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- M/s. Kotak Mahindra Prime Ltd
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Biju M.K
- Party Age
- 51
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Nisi N
- Party Age
- 45
- Relation
- D/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. M. Shahier Singh
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri. K.N Saseendran
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Not Decided
Description:
Petition dismissed for default
Evidence:
Petitioner absent. No representation. Petition dismissed for default.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Arbitration
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Commercial Court Kozhikode
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between M/s. Kotak Mahindra Prime Ltd vs Biju M.K et al regarding Arbitration and Conciliation Act.
Case Code Year
Case between M/s. Kotak Mahindra Prime Ltd vs Biju M.K et al regarding Arbitration and Conciliation Act.