Case Summary
Shriram Finance Limited filed an application under Section 9(ii) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996. The respondents were set exparte and the court proceeded with the hearing.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Property attached
Case Type
Arbitration
Final Judgment
No
The property was attached and the application was closed as the purpose was accomplished.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court found that the purpose of the application had been accomplished.
The court found that the purpose of the application had been accomplished.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The court found that the purpose of the application had been accomplished.
The court found that the purpose of the application had been accomplished.
Supporting Evidence
The court found that the purpose of the application had been accomplished.
Judgment Evidence:
Property attached. MA closed as purpose is accomplished.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Shriram Finance Limited
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Biju N
- Party Age
- 48
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Dhanesh Kumar
- Party Age
- 52
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Sreekanth Soman M
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Property attached.
Evidence:
Property attached. MA closed as purpose is accomplished.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Arbitration
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Commercial Court Kozhikode
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Shriram Finance Limited vs Biju N et al regarding Arbitration
Case Code Year
Case between Shriram Finance Limited vs Biju N et al regarding Arbitration