Case Summary
This case involves Dr. Sujith A.K as the petitioner/defendant and M/s. Medimall Kunnamangalam LLP as the respondent/plaintiff. The petition was filed for dismissal of a previous order due to the absence of representation.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Commercial Case
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the petition for default due to no representation from the respondent/plaintiff.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Not available
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
This petition coming on this day for hearing before me in the presence of Sri.T. Nandakumar Advocate for Petitioner/Defendant, Respondent/Plaintiff not entered in appearance and the court passed the following. No representation. No steps taken. Petition dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- M/s. Medimall Kunnamangalam LLP
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Dr. Sujith A.K
- Party Age
- 49
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri.T. Nandakumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
Petition dismissed for default due to no representation.
Evidence:
No representation. No steps taken. Petition dismissed for default.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Commercial Case
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Commercial Court Kozhikode
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between M/s. Medimall Kunnamangalam LLP vs Dr. Sujith A.K regarding petition filed under Order 9 Rule 13, r/w section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure.
Case Code Year
Case between M/s. Medimall Kunnamangalam LLP vs Dr. Sujith A.K regarding petition filed under Order 9 Rule 13, r/w section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure.