Similar Cases
Based on: O. S. No.224/2018 — Case between Shajeena Shameem vs Subaida regarding fixation of boundary and permanent prohibitory injunction.
48 matching cases found, ranked by shared legal context
O. S. No.279/2017
Case between Antony vs Shibu et al regarding Declaration, boundary fixation, and injunction
The suit involves siblings Antony and Shibu disputing the boundary of their inherited property, leading to unlawful encroachment by Shibu which Antony seeks to remedy.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No. 305/2018
Case between Thankamani et al vs Kunjumol et al regarding partition and mandatory injunction
This case involves plaintiffs Thankamani, Sarasu, and Saradha seeking a partition of a fixed deposit and a mandatory injunction against the 6th defendant, Federal Bank, due to the death of their brother Velayudhan. The defendants are the legal heirs of Velayudhan and are involved in a dispute over the shares of money in the fixed deposit and accrued interest.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No. 473/2016
Case between Koozhoor Bhagavathi Kshethram represented by Rakesh Venugopal vs Mazhuvannoor Grama Panchayat regarding perpetual injunction
The case involves a dispute over property rights between Koozhoor Bhagavathi Kshethram and Mazhuvannoor Grama Panchayat. The plaintiff is seeking a perpetual injunction to prevent the defendant from forming a new way through the disputed property.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S. No. 312/2017
Case between Sujatha Jayaraj vs Babu Jayaraj et al regarding partition and injunction
Sujatha Jayaraj filed a suit against her brother Babu Jayaraj and the Aluva Urban Co-operative Bank seeking partition and injunction regarding property inherited from their parents. The case involves allegations of fraud concerning a power of attorney and the mortgaging of the property.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S. No. 242/2014
Case between Nandakumar A.P. vs State of Kerala et al regarding mandatory and perpetual injunction
Nandakumar A.P. filed a suit against the State of Kerala and others seeking mandatory and perpetual injunction to remove encroachments on a public way that he claims is essential for accessing his property. The defendants include government officials and a private individual who allegedly encroached on the way.
Civil Suit
Partial
O.S. No. 17/2019
Case between Soman vs M.C. Vinayan et al regarding injunction and compensation
Soman filed a suit against M.C. Vinayan and others seeking injunction and compensation for alleged trespass and damage to his property. The court evaluated the claims regarding access to the property and determined the rights over the paths leading to it.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No. 159/2018
Case between T. K. Lalu vs State of Kerala et al regarding fixation of boundary and injunctive relief
The plaintiff, T. K. Lalu, is seeking to fix the boundary between his property and that of the defendants, who include the State of Kerala and others. The case revolves around allegations of inaccuracies in property boundaries established in a resurvey.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O. S. No.233/2018
Case between Sheela V vs Anitha V et al regarding partition
The case involves a partition suit filed by Sheela V against Anitha V and others regarding properties originally owned by Vasudevan Nair. The plaintiff claims her rightful share, asserting the defendants wrongfully dispossessed her and made unauthorized sales.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O. S. No.55/2014
Case between Danial Varghese et al vs State of Kerala et al regarding declaration of title and mandatory injunction
The plaintiffs, Danial Varghese and others, claim ownership of a property that has been wrongly classified as government land by the defendants, the State of Kerala and its officials. They seek a declaration of title and corrections in the revenue records.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O. S. No.395/2004
Case between K V George et al vs Mariyamma et al regarding partition and injunction
The plaintiffs, K V George and others, seek partition of property and injunction against the defendants, Mariyamma and others, who are interfering with their possession. The court found that the plaintiffs established their claim to the property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O. S. No.410/2015
Case between Jose vs Kochumon @ Santhosh et al regarding fixation of boundary and permanent prohibitory injunction.
Jose, the plaintiff, claims ownership of a property he received through a settlement deed and seeks relief against Kochumon @ Santhosh and others for boundary fixation and injunction to prevent trespassing. The defendants contend that there is already an existing boundary and allege that the plaintiff has encroached on their land.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O. S. No.262/2019
Case between Gopi N G et al vs Mani N G et al regarding partition
The plaintiffs, who are the legal heirs of late Nedumpuram Gopalan, are seeking a partition of the plaint schedule property which is claimed to be jointly owned. The defendants contested the plaintiffs' claims, asserting their own rights to the property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O. S. No.232/2018
Case between Sajeev et al vs Pramodan regarding declaration of absolute title and injunction
Sajeev and his family are plaintiffs seeking a declaration of title over a property and an injunction against Pramodan, the defendant, who they allege is attempting to trespass on their land. The case involves disputes over property boundaries and ownership rights.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O. S. No.272/2019
Case between Kusumavally vs State of Kerala et al regarding Mandatory injunction
The plaintiffs, Kusumavally and her sons, are claiming ownership of a property formerly owned by T. Vijayan, whose rights devolved to them after his death. They seek to challenge a mutation that favored the fifth defendant, claiming they are the rightful owners and that the defendants wrongfully altered the property records.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O. S. No.06/2018
Case between Devaki et al vs Chandran et al regarding partition and injunction.
This case involves plaintiffs Devaki and others seeking a partition and injunction against defendants Chandran and others, who are also legal heirs of the late Kaalukkurumban. The plaintiffs claim that the property is co-owned and have alleged that the defendants fabricated a false document to claim ownership.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O. S. No.136/2024
Case between Venugopal vs Chandran et al regarding specific performance of a contract for sale of immovable property
The plaintiff Venugopal seeks specific performance of a contract to sell property against the defendants Chandran, Sukumaran, and Girija. The defendants allegedly failed to execute a sale deed for a property after receiving an advance payment.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O. S. No.139/2019
Case between Suhara vs Muhammed Salam et al regarding partition and consequential injunction.
Suhara filed a suit for partition and permanent injunction against her siblings and a neighboring property owner regarding ancestral property. The defendants contested the identification and ownership claims over the property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O. S. No.377/2019
Case between Dibu Paul et al vs Johny et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiffs, who are brothers and their father, allege that the defendants, who are their relatives, have unlawfully interfered with their possession of a property. The plaintiffs seek a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants to prevent further interference.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS No. 13/2021
Case between C.V.Peter vs Alias George et al regarding declaration of prescriptive easement and permanent prohibitory injunction
Plaintiff C.V.Peter seeks declaration of prescriptive easement and permanent prohibitory injunction against defendants Alias George, Palliyan, and Krishnankutty. The case revolves around a pathway used by the plaintiff to access his property through the defendants' properties.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS No. 36/2021
Case between Jiji vs Valsa et al regarding partition and permanent prohibitory injunction
The case involves Jiji as the plaintiff filing for partition and permanent prohibitory injunction against Valsa and others.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS No. 33 / 2024
Case between Susy Paulose et al vs Eldho Mathai et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiffs, legal heirs of late Sri. Paulose, filed a suit for permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants for trespassing and causing damage to their property. Defendants failed to appear in court. Plaintiffs provided unchallenged evidence proving ownership and trespass.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S No. 866/2022
Case between Mini Jolly vs Noel et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction and mandatory injunction.
The plaintiff, Mini Jolly, is seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction and mandatory injunction against her siblings, Noel, Seena Darwin, Rema Francis, and Shini Godson, regarding their shared inherited properties. The defendants allegedly leased out the properties without her consent, leading to this legal action.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S. No.415/2021
Case between Kochuthressia Thomas vs Gopalan, Kalidasan regarding recovery of possession and injunction.
Kochuthressia Thomas is seeking recovery of possession and an injunction against Gopalan and Kalidasan due to an obstruction on a pathway. The plaintiff alleges that the defendants have blocked access to her property, which she purchased and has a right to use as per the sale deed.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S No. 234/2015
Case between Santhosh P @ Santhoshkumar vs Suresh P.S, Mallika Shanmughan regarding fixation of boundary and permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiff, Santhosh P @ Santhoshkumar, is involved in a legal dispute with the defendants, Suresh P.S and Mallika Shanmughan, regarding the fixation of the boundary of his property and preventing the defendants from trespassing. The case arises from allegations of encroachment and unauthorized construction by the defendants on the plaintiff's property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No.1585/2019
Case between His Holiness Shrimad Raghavendra Thirtha Swami et al vs Venkatesh Shenoy et al regarding declaration and permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiff, His Holiness Shrimad Raghavendra Thirtha Swami, the Sole Trustee of a charitable trust, sought a declaration and permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants, Venkatesh Shenoy and Mohan Shenoy, claiming exclusive use of a pathway. The defendants contested the plaintiff's rights, asserting their own claims to the pathway.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No. .1531/2019
Case between Jobin Thomas vs Thrikkakara Municipality et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Jobin Thomas, the plaintiff, is seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against Thrikkakara Municipality and Abdul Razak P.K. The case revolves around unauthorized demolition of property boundaries and potential construction disputes.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No. 1329/2018
Case between G Radhakrishnan vs M/s Goodhome Pvt. Ltd. et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
G Radhakrishnan, the plaintiff, filed a suit against M/s Goodhome Pvt. Ltd. and its managing director B R Ajit, along with Devi Ajit, seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction. The plaintiff claims ownership over a property and seeks protection against the defendants, who allegedly threatened to demolish his boundaries and trespass.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S. No. 1042/2019
Case between St Mary Magdalene Church, Moothedam et al vs M J George et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiff, St. Mary Magdalene Church, Moothedam, seeks a permanent injunction against the defendants for trespassing on their land. The defendants argue that the plaintiff has no rights over the disputed property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No. 406/2018
Case between Velayudhan, Soman, Ambika et al vs Gopi O.A, Mohanan O.A et al regarding Partition
The case involves a dispute over the partition of property belonging to the deceased Kochupennu. The plaintiffs claim their rights as legal heirs, while defendants argue that Kochupennu had executed a will transferring her property to one of them.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S. No. 426/2025
Case between Viswanathan R et al vs Kousalya et al regarding boundary excavation and property support.
The petitioners, a husband and wife, are seeking an injunction against the respondents over a dispute regarding boundary excavation between their properties. They claim their property is at risk due to the respondents' actions which have allegedly removed soil without providing lateral support.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S No. 1184/2023
Case between BCG-Golden Orchids Phase - II Association et al vs BCG-Golden Orchids Phase - I Association et al regarding construction works in common areas
The case involves petitions filed by the 1st defendant association seeking permission for repairs and construction in common areas, contested by the plaintiffs who argue the lack of urgency. The court has to decide if these works can proceed before the resolution of the pending suit.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No. 712/2019
Case between Joseph Varghese vs Greater Cochin Development Authority et al regarding rent enhancement dispute
Joseph Varghese, a businessman, is suing the Greater Cochin Development Authority and its Executive Committee over a disputed rent increase for a leased shop. The plaintiff claims that the defendants unilaterally raised the rent in violation of the lease terms and seeks a declaration that this increase is illegal.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S No. 543/2022
Case between Xavier vs Joshy @ Sebastian regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiffs, Xavier and Jancy, are husband and wife seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants, who are the brothers of the second plaintiff. The plaintiffs claim the right to use a pathway to access their property, which the defendants allegedly attempted to obstruct.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S. No. 1210/2017
Case between Purushan O K vs Soman et al regarding injunction
Purushan O K filed a suit against Soman and others seeking both mandatory and prohibitory injunctions related to a property dispute involving the demolition of a compound wall and encroachment issues. The plaintiff claims ownership of the property and seeks to prevent further damage by the defendants.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S No. 690/2018
Case between New Town Heights, Kakkanad Condominium, Owners Welfare Society vs M/s DLF Southern Towns Pvt. Ltd. et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The case involves the New Town Heights Owners Welfare Society seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against DLF Southern Towns Pvt. Ltd. and others regarding the exclusive use of an internal road within the apartment complex. The plaintiff claims that the defendants are attempting to convert the internal road into a public pathway, violating assurances made to the apartment owners.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No. 1463/2018
Case between Jose K.A. vs Greater Cochin Development Authority regarding rent enhancement and lease terms
Jose K.A. filed a suit against the Greater Cochin Development Authority challenging their unilateral increase in rent and security deposit for a leased shop. The plaintiff sought a declaration to enforce the original lease terms which limited rent increases.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S No. 920/2020
Case between V.Thulaseedharan Pillai et al vs Prof. Sourier Sebastian et al regarding declaration and injunction
The plaintiffs, owners and residents of house plots in the Divine Nagar housing colony, seek a declaration that only they have the right to use internal roads constructed in the colony. They contend that the defendants, who reside in the adjoining area, are attempting to gain access to these roads. The case involves issues around property rights and access to shared spaces.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S No. 783/2020
Case between Joshy vs State of Kerala et al regarding declaration of title and injunction.
The plaintiff, Joshy, is seeking a declaration of title and an injunction against the defendants, including the State of Kerala and its officials, for alleged illegal eviction from his property. The case revolves around claims of continuous possession and the applicability of the Kerala Land Conservancy Act.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S. No. 177/2024
Case between Jacob Kuruvila et al vs Jhony M K et al regarding fixation of boundary.
The plaintiffs, Jacob Kuruvila and Sani Jacob, sought a judgment regarding the fixation of a boundary. The defendants, Jhony M K and Vincent M K, were involved in the case.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S. No. 544/2011
Case between St. Antony's Church, Vaduthala et al vs Paul @ Ouso Paul regarding declaration of title and recovery of possession.
The case involves St. Antony's Church seeking a declaration of title and recovery of possession of property from Paul @ Ouso Paul, who claims possession through adverse possession. The court is determining whether Paul has indeed perfected title through adverse possession.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S No. 541/2020
Case between Abdul Azeez C.M et al vs D. Sajith regarding money recovery
The plaintiffs, Abdul Azeez C.M and Rani Abdul Azeez, filed a suit against the defendant, D. Sajith, for recovery of an amount due for damages and unpaid fees related to a lease agreement. The defendant denied the allegations and filed a counter claim for the return of a security deposit.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S No. 46/2009
Case between Maju P Abraham vs R.R.Antony, K.J.Joseph regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
Maju P Abraham filed a suit against R.R.Antony and K.J.Joseph seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction regarding a property dispute. The case revolves around allegations of ownership and possession of land that has led to threats of forced eviction.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S. No. 1631/2019
Case between Mary. P.J vs Johny Diselva et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Mary. P.J is the plaintiff claiming ownership and seeking an injunction against Johny Diselva and others who she alleges have unlawfully entered her property and disturbed her possession. The defendants claim a right of way based on usage for over 50 years.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S No. 661/2024
Case between Janeefer Mariam vs Kerala Film Producers Association regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
The plaintiff, Janeefer Mariam, alleges that the defendant, Kerala Film Producers Association, attempted to trespass on her property and obstruct her access to a pathway necessary for her property. The case revolves around a dispute regarding access rights to the plaintiff's property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No. 1099/2022
Case between Vincent K.A. vs Nelson @ Francis, Mini Francis regarding Partition
Vincent K.A. is seeking a partition of property that he claims is jointly owned with the defendants, who are his brother and sister. The defendants dispute his claims, stating that the property is exclusively theirs and that the plaintiff has no rights to it.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S No. 1502/2019
Case between Gopalakrishnan et al vs Sreedevi et al regarding declaration and permanent prohibitory injunction
Gopalakrishnan and Lalitha filed a suit against Sreedevi and others for a declaration of easementary rights and to restrain them from obstructing a pathway they claim to have used for over 75 years. The defendants deny the existence of such a pathway and claim that the plaintiffs have no right to it.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No. 86/2018
Case between Thankappan vs Lakshmanan et al regarding partition
This case involves a partition suit filed by Thankappan against his brothers and a few other defendants regarding the share of property and bank deposits left by their deceased father, Krishnan. The defendants were accused of attempting to withdraw the bank deposits without the plaintiff's consent.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No. 50/2015
Case between George vs Aliyamma, Biju Paulose et al regarding fixation of boundary and perpetual injunction
George is the plaintiff seeking to fix the boundary of his property against the defendants Aliyamma, Biju Paulose, and others. The defendants are claiming that their property overlaps with the plaint schedule property and are obstructing the plaintiff's request to demarcate the boundaries.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won