Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
OS No. 13/2021

Case between C.V.Peter vs Alias George et al regarding declaration of prescriptive easement and permanent prohibitory injunction

Court
THE MUNSIFF KOLENCHERY
Judge
Smt. Sirsha NA
Order Date
2025-11-20
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Plaintiff C.V.Peter seeks declaration of prescriptive easement and permanent prohibitory injunction against defendants Alias George, Palliyan, and Krishnankutty. The case revolves around a pathway used by the plaintiff to access his property through the defendants' properties.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
Plaintiff granted the right of easement in D schedule way and a permanent prohibitory injunction against defendants obstructing the pathway.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff proved continuous, open, and peaceable use of the pathway giving rise to an easement by prescription.

Judgment Evidence:

The suit is decreed granting plaintiff the right of easement in D Schedule way.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

C.V.Peter (63 years years) Chennekkattu House, Kolenchery Post, Peringol Kara, Aikkaranadu North Village, Kunnathunadu Taluk, Pin:682311 Others (Age not specified years)

Defendants

Alias George (37 years years) Irumbayil House, Kolenchery Post, Peringol Kara, Aikkaranadu North Village, Kunnathunadu Taluk, Pin:682311 Palliyan (75 years years) Kattaprayimolath House, Kolenchery Post, Peringol Kara, Aikkaranadu North Village, Kunnathunadu Taluk, Pin:682311 Krishnankutty (42 years years) Kattaprayimolath House, Kolenchery Post, Peringol Kara, Aikkaranadu North Village, Kunnathunadu Taluk, Pin:682311 Others (Age not specified years)

Reliefs

Relief Type: Declaration
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Declaration of prescriptive easement
Evidence:
The court recognizes plaintiff's easementary right
Relief Type: Permanent Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Permanent prohibitory injunction to prevent obstruction
Evidence:
Defendants are restrained from creating obstructions on pathway

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Certified Copy of Settlement Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Submitted as evidence of plaintiff's ownership of property
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Copy of Land Tax Receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Submitted as evidence of payment of land tax
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Certified copy of the Settlement Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Not mentioned
Reference:
Document Type: Commission Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Report submitted by advocate commissioner
Reference:
Ext.C1
Document Type: Rough Sketch
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Sketch submitted by advocate commissioner
Reference:
Ext.C1(a)
Document Type: Witness Testimony
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Witness testimony of C.V.Peter S/o Varkey
Reference:
PW1
Document Type: Witness Testimony
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Witness testimony of Bijeesh Krishnan S/o K.V.Krishnankutty
Reference:
PW2
Document Type: Witness Testimony
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Witness testimony of Ayyappankutty P S/o Cheria
Reference:
PW3
Document Type: Witness Testimony
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Witness testimony of M.N.Thankappan S/o Narayanan
Reference:
PW4
Document Type: Witness Testimony
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Witness testimony of Aliyas George S/o George
Reference:
DW1
Document Type: Witness Testimony
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Witness testimony of Deena Deepak
Reference:
DW2
Document Type: Witness Testimony
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Witness testimony of Asha Jayakumar
Reference:
DW3

Quick Facts

Location
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases