Case Summary
Jobin Thomas, the plaintiff, is seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against Thrikkakara Municipality and Abdul Razak P.K. The case revolves around unauthorized demolition of property boundaries and potential construction disputes.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Permanent prohibitory injunction
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court granted a permanent prohibitory injunction in favor of the plaintiff, restraining the defendants from trespassing into the plaintiff's property and demolishing its compound wall.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff established his legal right to the petitioned property and demonstrated a threat against its use.
The plaintiff established his legal right to the petitioned property and demonstrated a threat against its use.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiff established his legal right to the petitioned property and demonstrated a threat against its use.
The plaintiff established his legal right to the petitioned property and demonstrated a threat against its use.
Supporting Evidence
The plaintiff has proven his lawful possession over the plaint A schedule property and that such possession is interfered and threatened by the defendants.
Judgment Evidence:
In the result, the suit is decreed as follows; The defendants are restrained by a decree of permanent prohibitory injunction from trespassing into plaint A schedule property and also from demolishing its western compound wall and from putting up any constructions in plaint A schedule property.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Jobin Thomas
- Party Age
- 48
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Thrikkakara Municipality
- Relation
- Represented by
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Abdul Razak P.K.
- Party Age
- 55
Plaintiffs Documents
Original copy of sale deed No. 1258/2008 of SRO, Thrikkakkara, Tax receipt issued by Kakkanad Village Office, Photographs (5 Nos.)
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Basil Mathew
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sanjana Sara Varghese Annie
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- M.A. Jinsamol
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Permanent Injunction
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Prohibitory injunction restraining the defendants from trespassing and demolishing the plaintiffs' property.
Evidence:
The plaintiff has proven his lawful possession over the plaint A schedule property and that such possession is interfered and threatened by the defendants.
Relief Type:
Costs
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Plaintiff entitled to realize costs from the defendants.
Evidence:
The plaintiff is entitled to realize costs from the defendants.
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Sale deed
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Proves the plaintiff's ownership over the plaint A schedule property.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type:
Tax receipt
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Establishes tax payment for the plaint A schedule property.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type:
Photographs
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Visual evidence of the plaint A schedule property.
Reference:
Ext.A3(a) to A3(d)
Document Type:
CD
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Contains original recordings of the plaint A and B schedule properties.
Reference:
Ext.A3(e)
Document Type:
Commission Report
Submitted By:
Court
Relevance:
Details findings from the inspection of the plaint A schedule property.
Reference:
Ext.C1
Document Type:
Sketch
Submitted By:
Court
Relevance:
Illustrates the layout of the plaint A and B schedule properties.
Reference:
Ext.C1(a)
Document Type:
Photographs
Submitted By:
Court
Relevance:
Visual evidence supporting the commission report.
Reference:
Ext.C1(b) to C1(g)
Document Type:
Oral Evidence
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Testimony of the plaintiff regarding the illegal acts of the defendants.
Reference:
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Property and Possession Disputes
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Unauthorized occupation
Case Code
Case between Jobin Thomas vs Thrikkakara Municipality et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Jobin Thomas vs Thrikkakara Municipality et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction