Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S No. 541/2020

Case between Abdul Azeez C.M et al vs D. Sajith regarding money recovery

Court
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Rohit Nandakumar
Order Date
2025-11-21
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiffs, Abdul Azeez C.M and Rani Abdul Azeez, filed a suit against the defendant, D. Sajith, for recovery of an amount due for damages and unpaid fees related to a lease agreement. The defendant denied the allegations and filed a counter claim for the return of a security deposit.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the plaintiffs' suit and decreed the defendant's counter claim, ordering the plaintiffs to pay ₹1,45,000 with interest to the defendant.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
₹1,45,000 with interest at the rate of 6% per annum
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiffs failed to present relevant agreements and evidence supporting their claims.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is dismissed and the counter claim is decreed partly as follows: The plaintiffs are directed to pay to the defendant, an amount of ₹1,45,000/- (Rupees one lakh forty five thousand only) with interest at the rate of 6% per annum (simple interest) from 04.04.2018, till its realisation from the plaintiffs or from assets of plaintiffs.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Abdul Azeez C.M (56 years) 4D, Oriental Gardens, Karukappally - Mamangalam Road, Elamakkara P.O, Ernakulam Dt. Rani Abdul Azeez (49 years) 4D, Oriental Gardens, Karukappally - Mamangalam Road, Elamakkara P.O, Ernakulam Dt.

Defendants

D. Sajith (55 years) Pera - 26, Nanthanam, Pulikkillam East Road, Chembumukku, Kakkanad West P.O, Kochi - 682 030

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiffs seek recovery of ₹2,45,000/- from the defendant.
Evidence:
The suit is dismissed and the counter claim is decreed partly as follows: the plaintiffs are directed to pay to the defendant, an amount of ₹1,45,000/-.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The defendant is entitled to the costs of the suit.
Evidence:
The defendant is entitled to the costs of the suit and also the costs of the counter claim from the plaintiffs.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Complaint
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document submitted before the S.I of Police regarding the dispute.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Notice issued to the defendant seeking payment of dues.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Postal receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Proof of sending the lawyer notice to the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Postal Acknowledgment Card
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Acknowledgment of receipt from the defendant regarding the lawyer notice.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Lease Deed
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Photocopy of the lease agreement as part of the evidence.
Reference:
Ext.B1
Document Type: Deed of Licence
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Photocopy of the license agreement as part of the evidence.
Reference:
Ext.B2
Document Type: Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Notice issued by the defendant regarding the dispute.
Reference:
Ext.B3
Document Type: Postal receipt
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Proof of sending the notice to the plaintiffs.
Reference:
Ext.B4
Document Type: Reply Notice
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Response from the defendant to the notice issued by the plaintiffs.
Reference:
Ext.B5
Document Type: Judgment
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Certified copy of the judgment in a related case.
Reference:
Ext.B6
Document Type: Complaint Register
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Verified true copy of the register maintained by police.
Reference:
Ext.X1
Document Type: Police Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Report submitted by the inspector of police regarding the case.
Reference:
Ext.X2

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
95%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases