Case Summary
This case involves plaintiffs Thankamani, Sarasu, and Saradha seeking a partition of a fixed deposit and a mandatory injunction against the 6th defendant, Federal Bank, due to the death of their brother Velayudhan. The defendants are the legal heirs of Velayudhan and are involved in a dispute over the shares of money in the fixed deposit and accrued interest.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Plaintiffs are entitled for 3/4 share over Rs. 99,771/- and Rs. 54,868/- and interest accrued upon Rs. 54,868/-
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit is decreed in favor of the plaintiffs, granting them a 3/4 share of the fixed deposit amount and the interest accrued thereon, while the defendants are entitled to a 1/4 share. The court directed the 6th defendant bank to hand over the plaintiffs' share of the amounts.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiffs established their entitlement to the shares of the fixed deposit and the savings account amounts based on joint ownership.
The plaintiffs established their entitlement to the shares of the fixed deposit and the savings account amounts based on joint ownership.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiffs established their entitlement to the shares of the fixed deposit and the savings account amounts based on joint ownership.
The plaintiffs established their entitlement to the shares of the fixed deposit and the savings account amounts based on joint ownership.
Supporting Evidence
The documents produced and marked as Ext. A1 to A6 also would go to show that, the amount available in the term deposit is only Rs. 99,771/-. The interest accrued from the fixed term deposit is transferred to the savings account of Vallon Vellani.
Judgment Evidence:
In the result, the suit is decreed as follows: 1. The amount of Rs. 99,771/- and Rs. 54,868/- along with the interest accrued upon Rs. 54,868/- is to be partitioned and the plaintiffs are entitled for 3/4 share and the defendants are entitled for 1/4 share over the same.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Thankamani
- Party Age
- 64
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Sarasu
- Party Age
- 62
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Saradha
- Party Age
- 50
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Kunjumol
- Party Age
- 59
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Shaju
- Party Age
- 38
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Saji
- Party Age
- 36
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Satheesh
- Party Age
- 34
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Saritha
- Party Age
- 31
- Relation
- D/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Office copy of the Lawyer notice, A/d card, Copy of Certificate from Taluk Office, Kunnathunad, Federal Bank Statements
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- K.M. Alias
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- P.V Shiji
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Balachandran
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Anilkumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Saritha C.S.
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Mandatory Injunction
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Plaintiffs are entitled for the mandatory injunction directing the 6th defendant to hand over the plaintiffs' share over the specified amounts.
Evidence:
Therefore, the plaintiffs are entitled for the reliefs of mandatory injunction as prayed for.
Relief Type:
Partition
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
The amount of Rs. 99,771/- and Rs. 54,868/- along with the interest accrued upon Rs. 54,868/- is to be partitioned.
Evidence:
The suit is decreed as follows: The amount of Rs. 99,771/- and Rs. 54,868/- along with the interest accrued upon Rs.54,868/- is to be partitioned...
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Office copy of the lawyer notice
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document was marked and is part of the evidence presented by the plaintiffs.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type:
A/d Card
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document was marked and is part of the evidence presented by the plaintiffs.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type:
Copy of Certificate from Taluk Office, Kunnathunad, Perumbavoor
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document was marked and is part of the evidence presented by the plaintiffs.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type:
Copy of Statement of Account for the period 6/1/2009 to 1/2/2025 Federal Bank Pattimattom Branch
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document was marked and is part of the evidence presented by the plaintiffs.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type:
Copy of Statement of Account for the period 1/4/2024 to 31/01/2025 Federal Bank Pattimattom Branch
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document was marked and is part of the evidence presented by the plaintiffs.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type:
Certificate for Financial from Federal Bank Pattimattom Branch
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document was marked and is part of the evidence presented by the plaintiffs.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Property and Possession Disputes
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Perumbavoor
Common Reasons
Partition
Case Code
Case between Thankamani et al vs Kunjumol et al regarding partition and mandatory injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Thankamani et al vs Kunjumol et al regarding partition and mandatory injunction