Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 305/2018

Case between Thankamani et al vs Kunjumol et al regarding partition and mandatory injunction

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF
Judge
Smt. Alshari A.
Order Date
2025-02-24
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

This case involves plaintiffs Thankamani, Sarasu, and Saradha seeking a partition of a fixed deposit and a mandatory injunction against the 6th defendant, Federal Bank, due to the death of their brother Velayudhan. The defendants are the legal heirs of Velayudhan and are involved in a dispute over the shares of money in the fixed deposit and accrued interest.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The suit is decreed in favor of the plaintiffs, granting them a 3/4 share of the fixed deposit amount and the interest accrued thereon, while the defendants are entitled to a 1/4 share. The court directed the 6th defendant bank to hand over the plaintiffs' share of the amounts.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Plaintiffs are entitled for 3/4 share over Rs. 99,771/- and Rs. 54,868/- and interest accrued upon Rs. 54,868/-
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit is decreed in favor of the plaintiffs, granting them a 3/4 share of the fixed deposit amount and the interest accrued thereon, while the defendants are entitled to a 1/4 share. The court directed the 6th defendant bank to hand over the plaintiffs' share of the amounts.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiffs established their entitlement to the shares of the fixed deposit and the savings account amounts based on joint ownership.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiffs established their entitlement to the shares of the fixed deposit and the savings account amounts based on joint ownership.
Supporting Evidence
The documents produced and marked as Ext. A1 to A6 also would go to show that, the amount available in the term deposit is only Rs. 99,771/-. The interest accrued from the fixed term deposit is transferred to the savings account of Vallon Vellani.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed as follows: 1. The amount of Rs. 99,771/- and Rs. 54,868/- along with the interest accrued upon Rs. 54,868/- is to be partitioned and the plaintiffs are entitled for 3/4 share and the defendants are entitled for 1/4 share over the same.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Thankamani
Party Age
64
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Sarasu
Party Age
62
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Saradha
Party Age
50
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Kunjumol
Party Age
59
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Shaju
Party Age
38
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Saji
Party Age
36
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Satheesh
Party Age
34
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Saritha
Party Age
31
Relation
D/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Office copy of the Lawyer notice, A/d card, Copy of Certificate from Taluk Office, Kunnathunad, Federal Bank Statements
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
K.M. Alias
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
P.V Shiji
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Balachandran
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Anilkumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Saritha C.S.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Mandatory Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiffs are entitled for the mandatory injunction directing the 6th defendant to hand over the plaintiffs' share over the specified amounts.
Evidence:
Therefore, the plaintiffs are entitled for the reliefs of mandatory injunction as prayed for.
Relief Type: Partition
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The amount of Rs. 99,771/- and Rs. 54,868/- along with the interest accrued upon Rs. 54,868/- is to be partitioned.
Evidence:
The suit is decreed as follows: The amount of Rs. 99,771/- and Rs. 54,868/- along with the interest accrued upon Rs.54,868/- is to be partitioned...

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Office copy of the lawyer notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document was marked and is part of the evidence presented by the plaintiffs.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: A/d Card
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document was marked and is part of the evidence presented by the plaintiffs.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Copy of Certificate from Taluk Office, Kunnathunad, Perumbavoor
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document was marked and is part of the evidence presented by the plaintiffs.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Copy of Statement of Account for the period 6/1/2009 to 1/2/2025 Federal Bank Pattimattom Branch
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document was marked and is part of the evidence presented by the plaintiffs.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Copy of Statement of Account for the period 1/4/2024 to 31/01/2025 Federal Bank Pattimattom Branch
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document was marked and is part of the evidence presented by the plaintiffs.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Certificate for Financial from Federal Bank Pattimattom Branch
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document was marked and is part of the evidence presented by the plaintiffs.
Reference:
Ext.A6

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Property and Possession Disputes
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Perumbavoor
Common Reasons
Partition
Case Code
Case between Thankamani et al vs Kunjumol et al regarding partition and mandatory injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Thankamani et al vs Kunjumol et al regarding partition and mandatory injunction

Quick Facts

Location
Perumbavoor
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Perumbavoor
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Sat, 02/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 02/28/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
95%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between IDBI Bank Ltd et al vs Nimisha Shinil et al regarding maintainability of suit for fixation of boundaries and injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF KOLENCHERY
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Reebu Jacob Thomas vs ICICI Home Finance Limited regarding declaration and injunction
II ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between The Federal Bank Ltd vs Nasiya P N et al regarding suit for recovery of money
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between The Federal Bank Limited, Vengola Branch et al vs Sarath Saji regarding Realisation of Money
The Court of the Munsiff, Perumbavoor
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Union Bank of India vs M/s NEW SPECIAL DIAGNOSTIC regarding realisation of money
MUNSIFF COURT, PERUMBAVOOR
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won