Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 1631/2019

Case between Mary. P.J vs Johny Diselva et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction

Court
The Court of the Third Additional Munsiff & Rent Controller
Judge
Smt. Reeja R. Nair
Order Date
2025-11-27
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Mary. P.J is the plaintiff claiming ownership and seeking an injunction against Johny Diselva and others who she alleges have unlawfully entered her property and disturbed her possession. The defendants claim a right of way based on usage for over 50 years.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court ruled in favor of the plaintiff, granting a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants from trespassing onto her property.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Permanent prohibitory injunction restraining defendants from trespassing and construction on the plaint schedule property.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court ruled in favor of the plaintiff, granting a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants from trespassing onto her property.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff established legal title and possession over the plaint schedule property.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiff established legal title and possession over the plaint schedule property.
Supporting Evidence
The plaintiff has established her legal right over plaint schedule property and proved lawful possession over it.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed with costs restraining the defendants from trespassing into the plaint schedule property and from cutting open any new pathway through it.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Mary. P.J
Party Age
75
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Johny Diselva
Party Age
50
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Aslam
Party Age
40
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Jessy Bevera
Party Age
42
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Mary Bivera
Party Age
50
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Shimson Kuryakose
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Certified copy of partition deed No.906/1971, Tax receipt, Possession certificate, Certified copy of Sale Deed No. 2295/1971, Certified copy of Sale Deed No. 2186/1971, Notice issued by Cochin Corporation, Receipt issued by Cochin Corporation, Certificate issued from Village office, Ernakulam, Certified copy of Sale deed No. 2187/1971, Certified copy of Sale deed No. 2013/1979.
Defendants Documents
Certified copy of Sale deed No.2616/2017, Certified copy of gift deed No. 3951/2016, Building receipt.

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
P.G. Lenin
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
J. Asokan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sreekumar Thattaratth
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Permanent Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Permanent prohibitory injunction restraining the defendants from trespassing into the plaint schedule property and from cutting open any new pathway through it.
Evidence:
The suit is decreed with costs restraining the defendants from trespassing into the plaint schedule property and from cutting open any new pathway through it.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Rejected
Description:
Counter claim by the defendants.
Evidence:
The counter claim raised by the defendants is dismissed with costs.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Partition Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Certified copy of partition deed No. 906/1971 establishing title.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Tax receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Tax receipt dated 06.08.2019 showing payment related to the property.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Possession Certificate
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Possession certificate dated 07.09.2019 evidencing possession of the plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Sale deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Certified copy of sale deed No. 2295/1971 related to property transactions.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Sale deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Certified copy of sale deed No. 2186/1971 related to property transactions.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Notice issued by Cochin Corporation dated 14.05.2019.
Reference:
Ext.A8
Document Type: Receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Receipt issued by Cochin Corporation dated 17.05.2019.
Reference:
Ext.A9
Document Type: Certificate
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Certificate issued from Village office, Ernakulam.
Reference:
Ext.A12
Document Type: Sale deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Certified copy of sale deed No. 2187/1971 related to property transactions.
Reference:
Ext.A15
Document Type: Sale deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Certified copy of sale deed No. 2013/1979 related to property transactions.
Reference:
Ext.A16
Document Type: Partition Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Certified copy of partition deed No. 4300/2015 involved in ownership details.
Reference:
Ext.A18
Document Type: Sale deed
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Certified copy of sale deed No. 2616/2017 of Ernakulam SRO for establishing title.
Reference:
Ext.B1
Document Type: Gift Deed
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Certified copy of gift deed No. 3951/2016 establishing ownership.
Reference:
Ext.B2
Document Type: Building Receipt
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Building receipt dated 25.07.2024 relevant for property modifications.
Reference:
Ext.B4
Document Type: RTI Reply
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
RTI reply dated 25.11.2021 obtained from Village office for clarifying property details.
Reference:
Ext.B6
Document Type: Letter
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Original letter dated 01.01.2019 from one P.J. Marry to the Secretary, Cochin Corporation.
Reference:
Ext.B7
Document Type: Letter
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Certified copy of letter dated 10.03.2020 with No.ISO-MOEI-6/2019 concerning the property.
Reference:
Ext.B8
Document Type: Complaint
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Copy of complaint dated 27.12.2018 to the Station House Officer regarding property issues.
Reference:
Ext.B10
Document Type: Commission Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Commission report providing evaluation and findings related to the property.
Reference:
Ext.C1
Document Type: Commission Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Another commission report contributing to case assessment.
Reference:
Ext.C2
Document Type: Commission Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Further commission report outlining the current evaluation of property.
Reference:
Ext.C3

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Property and Possession Disputes
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Mary. P.J vs Johny Diselva et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Mary. P.J vs Johny Diselva et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Sat, 11/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 11/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
95%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases

Case between Mini Jolly vs Noel et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction and mandatory injunction.
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between G Radhakrishnan vs M/s Goodhome Pvt. Ltd. et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Purushan O K vs Soman et al regarding injunction
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Santhosh P @ Santhoshkumar vs Suresh P.S, Mallika Shanmughan regarding fixation of boundary and permanent prohibitory injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Kochuthressia Thomas vs Gopalan, Kalidasan regarding recovery of possession and injunction.
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Defendant Won