Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S No. 866/2022

Case between Mini Jolly vs Noel et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction and mandatory injunction.

Court
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Rohit Nandakumar
Order Date
2025-08-12
Duration
approximately-3 years 1 month

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, Mini Jolly, is seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction and mandatory injunction against her siblings, Noel, Seena Darwin, Rema Francis, and Shini Godson, regarding their shared inherited properties. The defendants allegedly leased out the properties without her consent, leading to this legal action.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the suit, concluding that the plaintiff could not establish any exclusive right over the jointly owned properties. The request for both a permanent prohibitory injunction and a mandatory injunction was denied.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff failed to prove any exclusive possession or right over the properties, and it was determined that her requests for injunctions were unwarranted.

Judgment Evidence:

In view of the discussions made above, the suit is dismissed. The parties are directed to suffer their respective costs to the suit.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Mini Jolly (52 years years) Naduvathezhathu House, Boat Jetty Road, Vaduthala P.O., Ernakulam, Pin - 682 023, now residing at 1310 Brookside, Ave Waukegan, Illinois, 60085, United State of America Baiju N.K. (51 years years) Palm Enclave C1, Palm Street Road, Elamakkara, Ernakulam

Defendants

Noel (59 years years) Kolarikkal House, Vaduthala Bridge, Ernakulam, Pin - 682 023 Seena Darwin (57 years years) 'Queen', Palam Road, Vaduthala, Ernakulam - 682 023 Rema Francis (55 years years) Alungal House, Vaduthala, Ernakulam - 682 023 Shini Godson (50 years years) Kollamparambil, Behind Oberon Mall, Padivattom, Ernakulam - 682 024

Reliefs

Relief Type: Permanent Injunction
Outcome: Refused
Description:
The plaintiff requested a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants.
Evidence:
A perpetual injunction as sought for cannot be granted.
Relief Type: Mandatory Injunction
Outcome: Refused
Description:
The plaintiff sought a mandatory injunction to evict an unauthorized tenant.
Evidence:
The mandatory injunction as sought for also cannot be granted.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Power of Attorney
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document grants authority to the power of attorney holder to prosecute the case.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: True copy of Will
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document establishes the inheritance and rights over the properties.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Death Certificate
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document proves the death of the plaintiff's parent, relevant for inheritance claims.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Death Certificate
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document proves the death of another relevant party in the inheritance.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: True copy of Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document was sent to the tenant regarding the eviction.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: True copy of letter
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document is relevant to the claims regarding the tenancy.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Commission Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
This document provides findings related to the property in dispute.
Reference:
Ext.C1
Document Type: Commission Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
This document further details findings pertinent to the case.
Reference:
Ext.C2

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Tue, 07/12/2022 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases