Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S No. 543/2022

Case between Xavier vs Joshy @ Sebastian regarding permanent prohibitory injunction

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Nanda Krishna M.
Order Date
2025-12-12
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiffs, Xavier and Jancy, are husband and wife seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants, who are the brothers of the second plaintiff. The plaintiffs claim the right to use a pathway to access their property, which the defendants allegedly attempted to obstruct.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the suit filed by the plaintiffs for a permanent prohibitory injunction, determining that they did not establish a right to use the pathway claimed.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiffs failed to prove any right over the pathway.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is dismissed with costs.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Xavier (58 years years) Palliparambil house (Valunkal), Thuthiyoor kara, Kakkanad village, Kanayannur taluk, Ernakulam District, Pin - 682 030 Jancy @ Anna Xavier (56 years years) Palliparambil house (Valunkal), Thuthiyoor kara, Kakkanad village, Kanayannur taluk, Ernakulam District, Pin - 682 030

Defendants

Joshy @ Sebastian (55 years years) Valunkal house, Thuthiyoor Kara, Kakkanad village, Kanayannur taluk, Ernakulam District, Pin - 682 030 Varghese (49 years years) Valunkal house, Thuthiyoor Kara, Kakkanad village, Kanayannur taluk, Ernakulam District, Pin - 682 030

Reliefs

Relief Type: Permanent Injunction
Outcome: Refused
Description:
Plaintiffs sought a permanent prohibitory injunction against defendants regarding the use of the plaint B schedule pathway.
Evidence:
The plaintiff has failed to plead and prove any kind of right over plaint B schedule property for this court to restrain obstruction of the plaintiff's enjoyment of the same by way of an equitable relief of injunction.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Gift Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Establishes the plaintiff's ownership of the plaint A schedule property.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Tax receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Proves the tax payment for the plaint A schedule property, supporting the plaintiff's claim.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Partition Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Details the property distribution and pathway assignment relevant to the case.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Sale deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Illustrates the sale of the property earmarked for the pathway.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Complaint
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Records the plaintiff's grievance regarding obstruction of the pathway.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Acknowledgment Receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Serves as proof of the complaint filed with the police.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Commission Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Provides observations relevant to the case, including details about the pathway.
Reference:
Ext.C1
Document Type: Rough Sketch
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Visual representation of the jurisdictional area in question, including the pathway.
Reference:
Ext.C1(a)

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases