Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S. No. 1099/2022

Case between Vincent K.A. vs Nelson @ Francis, Mini Francis regarding Partition

Court
Court of the Third Addl. Munsiff & Rent Controller, Ernakulam
Judge
Smt. Reeja R. Nair
Order Date
2025-10-07
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Vincent K.A. is seeking a partition of property that he claims is jointly owned with the defendants, who are his brother and sister. The defendants dispute his claims, stating that the property is exclusively theirs and that the plaintiff has no rights to it.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court found in favor of the plaintiff, allowing him a 1/6 share of the jointly owned property. The defendants will receive the remaining shares as ordered.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Preliminary decree of partition and separate possession of 1/6 share.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff successfully established his claim to a share of the property based on the evidence presented.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed and a preliminary decree of partition is passed as given under; (i) The plaint schedule property is found partiable. (ii) The plaint schedule property is ordered to be partitioned by metes and bounds and the plaintiff is allotted 1/6th share, with the remaining 4/6th share to the 1st defendant and 1/6th share to the 2ⁿᵈ defendant.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Vincent K.A. (66 years) Kalathiparambil House, Vallarpadam Desom, Mulavukad village

Defendants

Nelson @ Francis (57 years) H. No.13/68, Kalathiparambil House, Vallarpadam Desom, Mulavukad village Mini Francis (52 years) Kolangath Padam, VIII/232 (B), Munjalipadam Road, Tripunithura

Reliefs

Relief Type: Partition
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff sought a decree for actual division and separation of his 1/6 share in the plaint schedule property.
Evidence:
Therefore, this court is satisfied that the plaint schedule property is liable to be partitioned between plaintiff and defendants as sought for thereby entitling the plaintiff with 1/6th share.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Kraya Certificate
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The court referenced this document but ultimately rejected it due to lack of foundation for secondary evidence.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Sale deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document was accepted as evidence establishing the ownership and partition claim of the plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Tax receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document was accepted in evidence supporting the plaintiff's claims.
Reference:
Ext.A3

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases