Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S No. 661/2024

Case between Janeefer Mariam vs Kerala Film Producers Association regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.

Court
Court of the Munsiff, Ernakulam
Judge
Sri. Nanda Krishna M.
Order Date
2025-11-27
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, Janeefer Mariam, alleges that the defendant, Kerala Film Producers Association, attempted to trespass on her property and obstruct her access to a pathway necessary for her property. The case revolves around a dispute regarding access rights to the plaintiff's property.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed in favor of the plaintiff, restraining the defendants from trespassing on the plaintiff's property and awarding costs to the plaintiff.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Defendants, their men and agents are restrained from trespassing into the plaint A, B schedule property and from committing any act of waste therein.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The unchallenged affidavit and documents would satisfactorily prove the plaintiff's case.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed as follows: Defendants, their men and agents are restrained from trespassing into the plaint A,B schedule property and from committing any act of waste therein. Plaintiff shall also be entitled for the costs of the suit.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Janeefer Mariam (44 years years) 25/11B, Dr.Radhakrishnan nagar, 3ʳᵈ Cross Road, Chennai - 600 041

Defendants

Kerala Film Producers Association (KFPA) (Age not specified years) Arangath Pulleppady Cross road, Ernakulam, Cochin - 682 035

Reliefs

Relief Type: Permanent Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Defendants, their men and agents are restrained from trespassing into the plaint A,B schedule property and from committing any act of waste therein.
Evidence:
In the result, the suit is decreed as follows: Defendants, their men and agents are restrained from trespassing into the plaint A,B schedule property and from committing any act of waste therein.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Sale deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Original of the Sale deed no. 1907/58 of SRO Ernakulam proving ownership of the property.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Settlement Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Original of the Settlement deed no. 767/15 of SRO Ernakulam establishing the plaintiff's right to the property.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Commission Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Report filed by Adv. Amal M which provides additional evidence in support of the plaintiff's claims.
Reference:
Ext.C1

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases