Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O. S. No.279/2017

Case between Antony vs Shibu et al regarding Declaration, boundary fixation, and injunction

Court
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR
Judge
Smt. Sumey Chandran
Order Date
2025-11-12
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The suit involves siblings Antony and Shibu disputing the boundary of their inherited property, leading to unlawful encroachment by Shibu which Antony seeks to remedy.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The suit is decreed in favor of the plaintiff, Antony, granting boundary construction, removal of unauthorized wall, and restraining further encroachment by the defendant, Shibu.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:

Judgment Evidence:

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Antony (56 years years) Madayickal House, Kizhakkambalam Kara, Kizhakkambalam Village, Kunnathunadu Taluk

Defendants

Shibu (48 years years) Madayikkal House, Kumarapuram P O, Erumeli Kara, Kunnathunadu Village, Kunnathunadu Taluk

Reliefs

Relief Type: Declaration
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Permission granted to construct boundary as per commission plan
Evidence:
The plaintiff is permitted to construct the boundary as shown in the Commission plan
Relief Type: Mandatory Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Defendant directed to remove unauthorized wall and abstain from encroaching plaintiff's property
Evidence:
The defendant is directed to remove the unauthorized wall constructed within the plaintiff's property

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Certified copy of Will Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The plaintiff submitted this document as evidence to prove ownership of the property
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Commission Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
The court considered this report along with a survey sketch to determine the true boundary
Reference:
Ext.C1
Document Type: Survey Sketch
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
The court utilized this sketch as part of the evidence for the boundary dispute
Reference:
Ext.C1(a)

Quick Facts

Location
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
50%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases