Case Summary
The plaintiffs, who are the legal heirs of late Nedumpuram Gopalan, are seeking a partition of the plaint schedule property which is claimed to be jointly owned. The defendants contested the plaintiffs' claims, asserting their own rights to the property.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court determined that the plaint schedule property is jointly owned by all legal heirs as per the evidence presented.
The court determined that the plaint schedule property is jointly owned by all legal heirs as per the evidence presented.
Judgment Evidence:
In the result, the suit is decreed in part as follows: It is hereby declared that the plaint schedule property is the joint property of the plaintiffs and defendants, being the remaining property of late Nedumpuram Gopalan.
Parties Involved
Plaintiffs
Gopi N G (65 years years)
Molath House, Trikkariyoor Village, Kothamangalam Taluk.
Santha Haridas (56 years years)
Madathethukudy House, Okkal Kara, Chelamattam Village.
Leela Krishnankutty (51 years years)
Parakandam House, Perumbavoor Kara, Perumbavoor Village.
Sudheesh K S (38 years years)
Kotheliparambu House, Thottumugham P O, Kuttamassery Kara, Choondi (Keezhmadu) Village, Aluva Taluk.
Suraj K S (29 years years)
Kotheliparambu House, Thottumugham P O, Kuttamassery Kara, Choondi (Keezhmadu) Village, Aluva Taluk.
Defendants
Mani N G (58 years years)
Nedumpurath House, Iringole Kara, Perumbavoor Village.
Sheela (46 years years)
Nedumpurathu House, Malamuri Bhagam, Iringole Kara, Perumbavoor Village.
Subrahmanyan (60 years years)
Kotheliparambu House, Thottumugham P O, Kuttamassery Kara, Choondi (Keezhmadu) Village, Aluva Taluk.
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Declaration
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Declaration of the plaint schedule property as joint property of the plaintiffs and defendants.
Evidence:
It is hereby declared that the plaint schedule property is the joint property of the plaintiffs and defendants, being the remaining property of late Nedumpuram Gopalan.
Relief Type:
Possession
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Entitlement of plaintiffs and defendants to their respective shares in the property.
Evidence:
The plaintiffs 1 to 3 are entitled jointly to 9/18 shares, the plaintiffs 4 and 5 are entitled jointly to 2/18 shares, the defendants 1 and 2 are entitled jointly to 6/18 shares, and the third defendant is entitled to 1/18 share in the plaint schedule property.
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Partition Deed
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document serves as the basis for the plaintiffs' claim of ownership and partition of the property.
Reference:
Ext.A1