Similar Cases
Based on: IA No. 1 / 2025 — Case between Geetha Surendran W/o Surendran vs Kuriakose @ Kuriachan S/o Paulose regarding boundary dispute and injunction relief
48 matching cases found, ranked by shared legal context
OS No. 976/2024
Case between Benny John et al vs Anivrithan regarding temporary injunction
The plaintiffs, Benny John and Reena, sought a temporary injunction against the defendant, Anivrithan, to prevent him from selling a property involved in a disputed sale agreement. The defendant contested the allegations, claiming no such agreement existed.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S. No.856/2018
Case between Jayan. K.S et al vs M/s. Tata Motors Finance Ltd et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiffs, Jayan. K.S and Jayakumari Jayan, are a husband and wife facing threats from the defendants, M/s. Tata Motors Finance Ltd and its officers, regarding a loan for a truck. They seek a permanent injunction to prevent the defendants from entering their rented house and making threats related to the loan.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No. 13/2018
Case between M/s Swapna Bone Meal Co. vs V.J. Joy et al regarding perpetual injunction
M/s Swapna Bone Meal Co. seeks a perpetual injunction against V.J. Joy and others to prevent them from obstructing the operation of the bone meal unit. The defendants claim that the operation is illegal, causing environmental pollution and health risks to nearby residents.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No. 138/2022
Case between M.R. Gopinadhan Nair vs Secretary Perumbavoor Municipality regarding perpetual injunction and mandatory injunction
The case involves M.R. Gopinadhan Nair as the plaintiff, who is asking for a perpetual and mandatory injunction against the Secretary of the Perumbavoor Municipality and others regarding unauthorized constructions. The plaintiff claims that the defendants have violated building rules and encroached on his property.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S. No. 1549/2019
Case between Sasi vs Chokli et al regarding Permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiffs, Sasi and Soumini, are seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendant, Chokli, who attempted to obstruct their access to a pathway critical for their property. The case was brought due to concerns over the defendant's attempts to encroach on the pathway, impacting the plaintiffs' peaceful possession and enjoyment of their land.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S No. 76/2025
Case between Muhammed Rija P.M vs Thrikkakara Municipality regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Muhammed Rija P.M filed a suit against Thrikkakara Municipality seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction after the municipality removed a business signboard without proper notice. The court found that while the municipality could not act without due process, it could not impose a blanket prohibition on the municipality's actions.
Civil Suit
Partial
O.S. No. 292/2025
Case between Samson T George et al vs Arun Kumar Karerat et al regarding temporary injunction
This case involves petitioners Samson T George and Babu Mathew seeking a temporary injunction against the respondents Arun Kumar Karerat, Samson Fernandez, Annerine Mildred D’Silva, and MIR Realtors Pvt. Ltd. The petitioners argue that failure to grant the injunction will cause them irreparable harm.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No.1125/2024
Case between Leena Sham vs M/s Google L L C et al regarding a permanent prohibitory injunction.
Leena Sham has filed a suit against YouTube and her daughter, Sharikka Sham, seeking a permanent injunction to remove a video uploaded by her deceased son. The video is claimed to violate her privacy and has caused distress to the family after the son's death.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No. 626 /2022
Case between Aseeb vs Nahas et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiff, Aseeb, a senior citizen, is seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction to prevent the defendants from obstructing his access to a pathway that he claims is essential for ingress and egress to his property. The defendants, relatives of the plaintiff, contest the existence of the claimed pathway and the plaintiff's rights over it.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S. No. 995 / 2019
Case between Suresh Babu T vs Kiran M B et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiff, Suresh Babu T, filed a suit against Kiran M B and Grace Cheriyan for a permanent prohibitory injunction to prevent his forcible eviction from a leased property. The plaintiff claims he invested significantly in his business and fears illegal dispossession by the defendants.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No. 571 / 2020
Case between M/s Sinergia Media Labs LLP vs M/s Smart City (Kochi) Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiff, M/s Sinergia Media Labs LLP, filed a suit against the defendant, M/s Smart City (Kochi) Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd, seeking protection against eviction and service disruption. The case revolves around alleged non-payment of rent during the COVID-19 pandemic and the plaintiff's apprehension of unlawful eviction.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S No. 28/2023
Case between M/s. Gambier International Private Limited vs Darley Peethambaran et al regarding injunction
The plaintiff, M/s. Gambier International Private Limited, is seeking an injunction to prevent the defendants from forcefully evicting them from the rented property. The defendants have entered appearance but filed written statements denying the allegations.
Injunction
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No. 244 / 2023
Case between M/s Melmont Constructions Pvt. Ltd. et al vs Jayesh et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
The plaintiffs, M/s Melmont Constructions Pvt. Ltd. and others, are seeking a permanent injunction against the defendants, who are members of the Youth Wing of 'Lok Tantric Janata Dal', for obstructing access to the plaintiffs' development project in Ernakulam. The defendants staged protests claiming illegal activities by the plaintiffs.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No. 563/2025
Case between Jisha Mathew vs Jasar M K et al regarding temporary injunction.
Jisha Mathew, acting as the authorized agent of Mr. Ranjith Krishnan, filed a petition for temporary injunction against Jasar M K and Anas M A, who are alleged to have dumped waste on the property owned by Mr. Ranjith. The defendants denied the allegations and claimed ownership rights over the property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No. 64/2024
Case between Shivan M.V vs M. V Sarojini regarding injunction.
The plaintiff, Shivan M.V, is seeking an injunction against his sister, M. V Sarojini, regarding the use of a pathway that they jointly own. The plaintiff alleges that the defendant has been obstructing his ability to use the pathway, which is necessary for access to his property.
Injunction
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No. 436 of 2022
Case between K.J Thomas et al vs Saumya Maju et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
K.J Thomas and others are plaintiffs seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against Saumya Maju and others. The case concerns excavation activities by the defendants that threaten the plaintiffs' properties.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S.No. 762 /2024
Case between Park View Apartment Owners Welfare Association et al vs Anita James, Corporation of Cochin regarding temporary injunction.
The Park View Apartment Owners Welfare Association and its Treasurer are seeking a temporary injunction against Anita James and the Corporation of Cochin. They allege that Anita James has been unlawfully altering the common areas of their apartment building.
Injunction
Plaintiff Won
O.S No. 545/2024
Case between Soni Francis et al vs Pioneer Nirman India Pvt. (Ltd) et al regarding mandatory injunction
The plaintiffs, Soni Francis and Lizzy Francis, claim their right to an exclusive car parking facility in a property owned by them in Pioneer Towers. They have been denied this right by the defendants, who are involved in managing the property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No. 5 41/2019
Case between Varghese P Itoop vs Alliance residency owner's association et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
The plaintiff, Varghese P Itoop, is the owner of two commercial shop rooms and is involved in a dispute with the Alliance residency owner's association regarding the unauthorized removal of hoardings placed on his property. The association contends that the plaintiff violated their bye-laws, leading to this legal action.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No. 25 of 2009
Case between Cherada Kunhippocker et al vs Moideen's children et al regarding disputed right of way
Plaintiffs sought perpetual injunction to prevent obstruction of a way through disputed properties partitioned among the parties; Defendants contested plaintiffs' claim and ownership of the disputed way.
Civil Suit - Perpetual Injunction
Defendant Won
Original Suit No. 39 of 2013
Case between Machincheri Nafeesa et al vs Machincheri Hamza et al regarding boundary fixation
Plaintiff filed suit for boundary fixation but the suit got dismissed due to the plaintiff's absence in court.
Civil Suit - Boundary Fixation
Defendant Won
ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 301 OF 2014
Case between Alamchambattu Bava Haji vs Abdul Rasheed et al regarding boundary fixation and injunction
Alamchambattu Bava Haji filed a suit seeking fixation of boundaries and consequential injunction due to lack of specific boundaries between his property and defendants'. Despite repeated demands and legal processes initiated, defendants did not cooperate in fixing the boundaries, leading to the lawsuit.
Civil Suit - Boundary Fixation and Injunction
Defendant Won
ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 168 OF 2016
Case between Kunhimoideen vs Muhammed et al regarding boundary fixation and injunction
Plaintiff Kunhimoideen filed a suit against defendants Muhammed, Fathima, Rayinkuttikkanakath Hamza, and Kunhayishu seeking fixation of boundary and injunction.
Civil Suit - Boundary Fixation and Injunction
Defendant Won
ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 115 OF 2005
Case between Cholakkal Pathumma Umma et al vs Erukattil Narayanan et al regarding boundary fixation
Plaintiffs filed suit for fixing the boundary between their property's eastern portion and defendants' property. Plaintiff later sought permission to withdraw the suit with intent to file a fresh suit due to some defects in the case.
Civil Suit - Boundary Fixation
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 167 OF 2014
Case between Makkutty et al vs Vattaparambil Kunhikitta et al regarding boundary fixation
Plaintiff filed suit seeking fixation of boundary between A, B, C schedule properties after a dispute arose over constructing a compound wall. First defendant agreed to fix the boundary following a mediation and commissioner's report.
Civil Suit - Boundary Fixation
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 109 OF 2011
Case between Eingapadalil Kadeeja et al vs Chenganakattil Abdurahiman et al regarding boundary fixation and injunction
Plaintiff filed suit seeking boundary fixation and injunction. The court dismissed the suit as the plaintiff was absent and had no representation.
Civil Suit - Boundary Fixation and Injunction
Defendant Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 280 OF 2012
Case between Kacheri Kallichath Ismail et al vs Pathumma et al regarding boundary fixation and injunction
Plaintiffs sought the fixation of boundaries and consequent injunction for their property which resulted in a successful suit decree.
Civil Suit - Boundary Fixation and Injunction
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 26 OF 2013
Case between Vazhamthodi Saidalavi vs Thekkethil Marakkar et al regarding fixation of boundary
Plaintiff filed a suit seeking to fix the boundaries of a shared property in joint possession with other co-owners, alleging encroachment and construction by the defendants.
Civil Suit - Boundary Fixation
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No.101 OF 2012
Case between Ayishummu vs Kunhappa regarding fixing of boundary and mandatory injunction
Plaintiff Ayishummu filed suit against defendant Kunhappa seeking to fix the boundary and obtain a mandatory injunction due to obstruction in using an accessway to the property.
Civil Suit - Fixation of Boundary and Mandatory Injunction
Defendant Won
ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 10 OF 2013
Case between Ayisha vs Kadeejakkutty et al regarding boundary fixation and injunction
Ayisha filed a suit against Kadeejakkutty and others for the fixation of boundaries and injunction. A compromise was reached between the parties regarding the demolition of structures and construction of boundary walls.
Civil Suit - Boundary Fixation and Injunction
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No. 20 OF 2015
Case between Hamza vs Basheer et al regarding boundary fixation and permanent prohibitory injunction
Hamza, the plaintiff, filed a suit against Basheer and others seeking the fixation of boundaries of his property and a permanent prohibitory injunction to prevent unauthorized construction and road access through his property.
Civil Suit - Boundary Fixation and Permanent Prohibitory Injunction
Plaintiff Won
OS No. 3 / 2025
Case between True Coat Paints Pvt.Ltd. vs Villoonni Haskar regarding Recovery of Money
This case involves a suit for recovery of due amount for paint items purchased on credit. Plaintiff True Coat Paints Pvt.Ltd. claims that defendant Villoonni Haskar bounced a cheque issued in settlement of the debt.
Recovery of Money
Plaintiff Won
OS No. 87 / 2024
Case between Deepa S Vijayan vs Sundaram Finance Ltd et al regarding ad-interim injunction.
Deepa S Vijayan is seeking an ad-interim injunction against Sundaram Finance Ltd and others. The court granted the injunction to prevent the defendants from further actions regarding the vehicle mentioned in the plaint.
Injunction
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No.237/2025
Case between Lini Mathew, Basil Mathew vs Joy regarding temporary prohibitory injunction
Petitioners Lini Mathew and Basil Mathew sought an injunction to protect the boundary ridge of their property from destruction. Respondent Joy argued that the tractor movement was necessary for agricultural purposes and the ridge shouldn't be protected.
Injunction
O. S. No.279/2017
Case between Antony vs Shibu et al regarding Declaration, boundary fixation, and injunction
The suit involves siblings Antony and Shibu disputing the boundary of their inherited property, leading to unlawful encroachment by Shibu which Antony seeks to remedy.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S No. 234/2015
Case between Santhosh P @ Santhoshkumar vs Suresh P.S, Mallika Shanmughan regarding fixation of boundary and permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiff, Santhosh P @ Santhoshkumar, is involved in a legal dispute with the defendants, Suresh P.S and Mallika Shanmughan, regarding the fixation of the boundary of his property and preventing the defendants from trespassing. The case arises from allegations of encroachment and unauthorized construction by the defendants on the plaintiff's property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S.No.45/2016
Case between Ibrahim and Rahna vs Poulose et al regarding restoration of a suit
Ibrahim and Rahna filed a petition to restore their suit after it was dismissed for default due to their absence. The court found their reasons for not appearing unconvincing and dismissed the petition.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S. No. 86/2018
Case between Thankappan vs Lakshmanan et al regarding partition
This case involves a partition suit filed by Thankappan against his brothers and a few other defendants regarding the share of property and bank deposits left by their deceased father, Krishnan. The defendants were accused of attempting to withdraw the bank deposits without the plaintiff's consent.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No. 242/2024
Case between M/s Greenland Particle Boards Private Limited vs Abdul Azeem Mohammed Koya regarding withdrawal of suit.
M/s Greenland Particle Boards Private Limited has filed a suit against Abdul Azeem Mohammed Koya. The suit was finally heard and dismissed as withdrawn.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
E.P. No. 147/2022
Case between Marambilly Service Co-operative Bank No.E-265 vs Anvar regarding recovery of decreetal amount
Marambilly Service Co-operative Bank is seeking to recover a decreetal amount from Anvar. The court found that Anvar has the means to pay the debt but has willfully neglected to do so.
Execution Petition
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No. 14/2019
Case between M/s. Chaithanya Enterprises et al vs Basil Paul et al regarding recovery of money.
The plaintiffs, M/s. Chaithanya Enterprises and its partners, filed a suit against the defendants for the recovery of money related to defaults in chitty payments. The case revolves around chitty transactions initiated by the plaintiffs and the defendants' failure to pay the agreed installments.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No. 29/2019
Case between M/s. Matrix Finbiz Pvt. Ltd et al vs Ranjitha Nidheesh et al regarding realization of money
The plaintiff, M/s. Matrix Finbiz Pvt. Ltd, is seeking the recovery of a loan amount from the defendants who defaulted on repayments. The suit was brought about after repeated demands for payment were ignored by the defendants.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No. 353/2024
Case between Pathrose Jacob vs R.C Central Charitable Trust regarding dismissal of suit
Pathrose Jacob is the plaintiff who filed a suit against R.C Central Charitable Trust. The suit was dismissed as not pressed based on a memo filed by the plaintiff.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S. No. 45/2019
Case between Saju K.V. vs Kerala State Beverages (Manufacturing and marketing) Corporation Ltd. regarding I.A. No. 2/2025
Saju K.V. filed a petition against Kerala State Beverages Corporation regarding an interlocutory application. The court has heard the petition and delivered an order.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No. 356/2018
Case between M/s. Matrix Finbiz Pvt. Ltd et al vs Dileepkumar P. et al regarding realization of money.
M/s. Matrix Finbiz Pvt. Ltd filed a suit against the defendants for the recovery of a defaulted loan amount. The defendants failed to repay the loan as per the agreed installments.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No. 326/2017
Case between Biju vs Francis et al regarding demarcation of property shares
Biju, the plaintiff, has sought a direction to demarcate a way through the property to allocate shares. The court found no objection to the petition and allowed it.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O. S. No.410/2015
Case between Jose vs Kochumon @ Santhosh et al regarding fixation of boundary and permanent prohibitory injunction.
Jose, the plaintiff, claims ownership of a property he received through a settlement deed and seeks relief against Kochumon @ Santhosh and others for boundary fixation and injunction to prevent trespassing. The defendants contend that there is already an existing boundary and allege that the plaintiff has encroached on their land.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No. 330/2025
Case between T F George vs CSML (Cochin Smart Mission Ltd.) et al regarding temporary prohibitory injunction
T F George, a senior citizen and co-owner of land, filed a petition against CSML and Kochi Municipal Corporation seeking a temporary prohibitory injunction to prevent encroachments on his property during a beautification project. The case involves issues of boundary demarcation and the rights of property owners.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won