Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S. No. 563/2025

Case between Jisha Mathew vs Jasar M K et al regarding temporary injunction.

Court
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Nanda Krishan M
Order Date
2025-09-17
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Jisha Mathew, acting as the authorized agent of Mr. Ranjith Krishnan, filed a petition for temporary injunction against Jasar M K and Anas M A, who are alleged to have dumped waste on the property owned by Mr. Ranjith. The defendants denied the allegations and claimed ownership rights over the property.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court granted the petition for temporary injunction, allowing the plaintiff to prevent the defendants from dumping waste on the property while the case is being considered.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Temporary injunction against dumping waste.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The petitioner established a prima facie case of nuisance caused by the defendants.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the petition is allowed.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Jisha Mathew (45 years years) KKRRA 32, Thriveni Lane, Kakkanad Village, Thrikakkara Desom, Thrikakkara North P O, Pin 682 021, Kanayannur Taluk, Ernakulam District, Kerala State

Defendants

Jasar M K (32 years years) Mulakkapalliyil House, Ward Number- 17, Near Rajagiri Valley Masjid, Pappakudath Road, Chittethukara Desom, Kakkanad Village, Kanayannur Taluk, Kochi, Pin 682 037 Anas M A (35 years years) Mulakkapalliyil House, Ward Number- 17, Near Rajagiri Valley Masjid, Pappakudath Road, Chittethukara Desom, Kakkanad Village, Kanayannur Taluk, Kochi, Pin 682 037

Reliefs

Relief Type: Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
An interim prohibitory injunction restraining the respondents from trespassing and dumping waste on the plaint schedule property.
Evidence:
Hence, the point is found in favour of the petitioner.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Authorization letter
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This letter shows the authorization given to the plaintiff by the owner to manage the property.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Sale deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This deed establishes the ownership of the property by Mr. Ranjith Krishnan.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Tax receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document proves that land tax is being paid regularly by the plaintiff on behalf of the owner.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Complaint
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This complaint was lodged to report the illegal dumping and burning of waste by the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Complaint
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This complaint was submitted to the District Collector regarding the nuisance caused by the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Complaint
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document is another complaint regarding the illegal activities of the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: FIR
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This FIR addresses the criminal activity involving the dumping of waste on the property.
Reference:
Ext.A7
Document Type: Newspaper Cutting
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This cutting provides evidence of the incident related to the dumping of plastic waste.
Reference:
Ext.A8
Document Type: Sale deed
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
This document contains information about the ownership claims made by the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.B1
Document Type: Sale deed
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
This sale deed further substantiates the defendants' claims over the property and rights therein.
Reference:
Ext.B2
Document Type: Sale deed
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
This exhibit includes details of previous ownership relevant to the current dispute.
Reference:
Ext.B3
Document Type: Location Sketch
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
This sketch depicts the layout and related properties in the context of the dispute.
Reference:
Ext.B4
Document Type: Commission Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
This report offers insights into the physical condition and boundaries of the property in question.
Reference:
Ext.C1

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam District, Kerala State
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases