Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No.856/2018

Case between Jayan. K.S et al vs M/s. Tata Motors Finance Ltd et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction

Court
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Judge
Reeja R. Nair
Order Date
2025-11-20
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiffs, Jayan. K.S and Jayakumari Jayan, are a husband and wife facing threats from the defendants, M/s. Tata Motors Finance Ltd and its officers, regarding a loan for a truck. They seek a permanent injunction to prevent the defendants from entering their rented house and making threats related to the loan.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court granted a permanent prohibitory injunction preventing the defendants from trespassing into the plaintiffs' rented dwelling house and making threats regarding loan settlement.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
A decree of permanent prohibitory injunction
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court granted a permanent prohibitory injunction preventing the defendants from trespassing into the plaintiffs' rented dwelling house and making threats regarding loan settlement.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The entire relief sought by the plaintiffs was acknowledged as being accepted by the defendants without further issues to adjudicate.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The entire relief sought by the plaintiffs was acknowledged as being accepted by the defendants without further issues to adjudicate.
Supporting Evidence
Considering the fact that there remain no further issues to be adjudicated in this case, the suit is decreed as follows: A decree of permanent prohibitory injunction is passed restraining the defendants, their men or agents or anybody acting under them from trespassing into the rented dwelling house of the plaintiffs and from intimidating and threatening them from settling the loan availed by them, other than by due process of law.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence this court is also of the opinion that no purpose will be served in proceeding further with this case.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Jayan. K.S
Party Age
52
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Jayakumari Jayan
Party Age
49
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
M/s. Tata Motors Finance Ltd.
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Rajesh Paul
Party Age
40
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Biju
Party Age
30
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
A.T.Anil Kumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Krishob. K. Nair
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
P. Fazil
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Permanent Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
A decree of permanent prohibitory injunction is passed restraining the defendants, their men or agents or anybody acting under them from trespassing into the rented dwelling house of the plaintiffs and from intimidating and threatening them from settling the loan availed by them, other than by due process of law.
Evidence:
the suit is decreed as follows: A decree of permanent prohibitory injunction is passed restraining the defendants, their men or agents or anybody acting under them from trespassing into the rented dwelling house of the plaintiffs and from intimidating and threatening them from settling the loan availed by them, other than by due process of law.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Injunction and Access Rights
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Jayan. K.S et al vs M/s. Tata Motors Finance Ltd et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Jayan. K.S et al vs M/s. Tata Motors Finance Ltd et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction

Case Flags

Cheque-Related Case
Nature of Cheque Case
Cheque issued towards legally enforceable debt

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Sat, 11/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 11/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases

Case between Leena Sham vs M/s Google L L C et al regarding a permanent prohibitory injunction.
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Samson T George et al vs Arun Kumar Karerat et al regarding temporary injunction
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Muhammed Rija P.M vs Thrikkakara Municipality regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Partial
Case between Sasi vs Chokli et al regarding Permanent prohibitory injunction
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Benny John et al vs Anivrithan regarding temporary injunction
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won