Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S. No.856/2018

Case between Jayan. K.S et al vs M/s. Tata Motors Finance Ltd et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction

Court
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Judge
Reeja R. Nair
Order Date
2025-11-20
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiffs, Jayan. K.S and Jayakumari Jayan, are a husband and wife facing threats from the defendants, M/s. Tata Motors Finance Ltd and its officers, regarding a loan for a truck. They seek a permanent injunction to prevent the defendants from entering their rented house and making threats related to the loan.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court granted a permanent prohibitory injunction preventing the defendants from trespassing into the plaintiffs' rented dwelling house and making threats regarding loan settlement.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
A decree of permanent prohibitory injunction
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The entire relief sought by the plaintiffs was acknowledged as being accepted by the defendants without further issues to adjudicate.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence this court is also of the opinion that no purpose will be served in proceeding further with this case.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Jayan. K.S (52 years) Puthiyakavu Thekkumbhagam, Thripunithura, PIN 682301 Jayakumari Jayan (49 years) Puthiyakavu Thekkumbhagam, Thripunithura, PIN 682301

Defendants

M/s. Tata Motors Finance Ltd. (Age not specified years) 3ʳᵈ floor Josh Centre, IMG Infopark Road, Kurunagari P.O, Kakkanad-682030 Rajesh Paul (40 years) 3ʳᵈ floor Josh Centre, IMG Infopark Road, Kurunagari P.O, Kakkanad-682030 Biju (30 years) 3ʳᵈ floor Josh Centre, IMG Infopark Road, Kurunagari P.O, Kakkanad-682030

Reliefs

Relief Type: Permanent Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
A decree of permanent prohibitory injunction is passed restraining the defendants, their men or agents or anybody acting under them from trespassing into the rented dwelling house of the plaintiffs and from intimidating and threatening them from settling the loan availed by them, other than by due process of law.
Evidence:
the suit is decreed as follows: A decree of permanent prohibitory injunction is passed restraining the defendants, their men or agents or anybody acting under them from trespassing into the rented dwelling house of the plaintiffs and from intimidating and threatening them from settling the loan availed by them, other than by due process of law.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases