Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No. 76/2025

Case between Muhammed Rija P.M vs Thrikkakara Municipality regarding permanent prohibitory injunction

Court
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Rohit Nandakumar
Order Date
2025-03-20
Duration
approximately-0 years 0 days
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Muhammed Rija P.M filed a suit against Thrikkakara Municipality seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction after the municipality removed a business signboard without proper notice. The court found that while the municipality could not act without due process, it could not impose a blanket prohibition on the municipality's actions.

Judgment Outcome

Partial Relief
Interim Order
The suit was partly decreed, restraining the defendant from removing any advertisement boards without following due process of law while allowing the plaintiff to bear his own costs.
Judgment Favored
Partial
Relief Granted
Permanent prohibitory injunction from removing sign boards without due process of law
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was partly decreed, restraining the defendant from removing any advertisement boards without following due process of law while allowing the plaintiff to bear his own costs.
Key Reasoning:
The evidence of the plaintiff was unchallenged, showing unauthorized removal of the sign boards by the defendant.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The evidence of the plaintiff was unchallenged, showing unauthorized removal of the sign boards by the defendant.
Supporting Evidence
The plaintiff raises a case that the defendant has unauthorizedly and without permission removed board and is threatening to remove boards that are placed by the enterprise of the plaintiff.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is partly decreed as follows:- I. The defendant is restrained by way of a decree of permanent prohibitory injunction from removing the sign boards or other advertisement boards of the enterprise of the plaintiff – ‘Castle of Jeans’, otherwise than by due process of law or in a manner as directed by law or under directions of any court.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Muhammed Rija P.M
Party Age
51
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Thrikkakara Municipality
Relation
represented by its Secretary
Plaintiffs Documents
Licence issued by Thrikkakara Municipality, G.S.T Registration Certificate, Photocopy of receipt issued by KSEB
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Jacob George
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Permanent Injunction
Outcome: Partly Granted
Description:
The defendant is restrained from removing the sign boards or other advertisement boards of the enterprise of the plaintiff without due process of law.
Evidence:
the suit can be partly allowed and an injunction of limited nature can be granted. I am of the opinion that the defendant can be restrained from removing any sign boards or advertisement boards without following due process of law.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is directed to suffer his costs to the suit.
Evidence:
the plaintiff can be directed suffered his costs to the proceedings.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Licence
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Licence issued by Thrikkakara Municipality for the plaintiff's business.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: G.S.T Registration Certificate
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
G.S.T Registration Certificate related to the plaintiff's business.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Photocopy of receipt issued by KSEB related to the plaintiff's business.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Commission Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Commission report filed by the Adv. Commissioner concerning the case.
Reference:
Ext.C1

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Injunction and Access Rights
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Unauthorized occupation
Case Code
Case between Muhammed Rija P.M vs Thrikkakara Municipality regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Muhammed Rija P.M vs Thrikkakara Municipality regarding permanent prohibitory injunction

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Sat, 03/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Mon, 03/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases

Case between Soni Francis et al vs Pioneer Nirman India Pvt. (Ltd) et al regarding mandatory injunction
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between K.J Thomas et al vs Saumya Maju et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Sasi vs Chokli et al regarding Permanent prohibitory injunction
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Jayan. K.S et al vs M/s. Tata Motors Finance Ltd et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Benny John et al vs Anivrithan regarding temporary injunction
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won