Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 26 OF 2013

Case between Vazhamthodi Saidalavi vs Thekkethil Marakkar et al regarding fixation of boundary

Court
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Judge
Smt. Vincy.T.V.
Order Date
2017-10-31
Duration
4 years
Case Closed
Tue, 10/31/2017 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Plaintiff filed a suit seeking to fix the boundaries of a shared property in joint possession with other co-owners, alleging encroachment and construction by the defendants.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed the suit, fixing the boundaries of the disputed property and granting a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants from entering or constructing on the plaintiff's property.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Permanent prohibitory injunction and boundary fixation
Case Type
Civil Suit - Boundary Fixation
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed the suit, fixing the boundaries of the disputed property and granting a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants from entering or constructing on the plaintiff's property.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court found sufficient evidence and expert reports corroborating the plaintiff's claim of joint ownership and outlined boundaries, thereby restraining the defendants.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The court found sufficient evidence and expert reports corroborating the plaintiff's claim of joint ownership and outlined boundaries, thereby restraining the defendants.
Supporting Evidence
The only contention raised by the defendant was regarding accuracy of measurements by the advocate commissioner. However, the court found the boundaries clearly delineated in the expert reports and title deeds, concluding in favor of the plaintiff.

Judgment Evidence:

The suit is decreed as follows: Line 'AB' is fixed as southern boundary to plaint A schedule property. Line 'AH' is fixed as the western boundary to plaint A schedule property. Defendants are permanently restrained from entering or making any construction on the property. Ext.C5 report and C6 plan shall form part of the decree. Defendant to pay costs.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Vazhamthodi Saidalavi
Party Age
57
Relation
S/o Muhammed kutty Haji
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Thekkethil Marakkar
Party Age
60
Relation
S/o Koyakkutty
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Keyamthodi Kunhipathu
Party Age
52
Relation
W/o Thekkethil Marakkar
Plaintiffs Documents
Copy of Jenm Assignment deed, Tax receipt, Copy of report received by Valavannur village Officer, Survey plan
Defendants Documents
Copy of Jenm Assignment deed, Tax receipt, Survey plan, Certified copy of Criminal Revision petition

Advocates

Reliefs

Relief Type: Permanent Prohibitory Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
To restrain defendants from entering or constructing on the plaintiff's property
Evidence:
The suit is decreed as follows: Line 'AB' is fixed as southern boundary to plaint...Defendants are permanently restrained from entering or making any construction on the property.
Relief Type: Boundary Fixation
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Fixing the southern and western boundaries of the plaintiff's property
Evidence:
Line 'AB' is fixed as southern boundary to plaint A schedule property. Line 'AH' is fixed as the western boundary...

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Copy of Jenm Assignment Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Proof of property ownership
Reference:
A1
Document Type: Tax receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Documentary evidence of tax payment
Reference:
A2
Document Type: Certified copy of Criminal Revision petition
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Document submitted to contest plaintiff's claims
Reference:
B4
Document Type: Commission Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Report submitted by Advocate Commissioner
Reference:
C1
Document Type: Commission Plan
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Plan submitted by Advocate Commissioner
Reference:
C2

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit - Boundary Fixation
Category
Injunction and Access Rights
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Boundary Dispute
Case Code
Case between Vazhamthodi Saidalavi vs Thekkethil Marakkar et al regarding fixation of boundary
Case Code Year
Case between Vazhamthodi Saidalavi vs Thekkethil Marakkar et al regarding fixation of boundary

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Case Filed
Thu, 10/31/2013 - 12:00
Case Closed
Tue, 10/31/2017 - 12:00
From
Sun, 10/01/2017 - 12:00
To
Tue, 10/31/2017 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
95%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases

Case between Machincheri Nafeesa et al vs Machincheri Hamza et al regarding boundary fixation
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Civil Suit - Boundary Fixation Defendant Won
Case between Cholakkal Pathumma Umma et al vs Erukattil Narayanan et al regarding boundary fixation
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Civil Suit - Boundary Fixation Plaintiff Won
Case between Makkutty et al vs Vattaparambil Kunhikitta et al regarding boundary fixation
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Civil Suit - Boundary Fixation Plaintiff Won
Case between Areeparambil Hamza et al vs Ramadas.P.V regarding boundary fixation
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Civil Suit - Boundary fixation Defendant Won
Case between Abdul Rasakh vs Muhammed Abdu rehman regarding boundary fixation
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Civil Suit - Boundary Fixation Dismissed