Case Summary
Abdul Rasakh filed a suit against Muhammed Abdu rehman seeking boundary fixation. The matter was settled between parties resulting in the dismissal of the suit.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Dismissed
Relief Granted
Not Decided
Case Type
Civil Suit - Boundary Fixation
Final Judgment
No
The suit for boundary fixation was dismissed as the matter was settled between the parties.
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Suit for fixation of boundary. Matter settled between parties. Statement also filed. Hence no necessity to proceed with this suit. Hence dismissed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Abdul Rasakh
- Party Age
- 51
- Relation
- S/o. Kunhimuhammed
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Muhammed Abdu rehman
- Party Age
- 73
- Relation
- S/o. Bavakkuty Haji
Plaintiffs Documents
Not mentioned
Defendants Documents
Not mentioned
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Dinesh Pookkayil
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. P. Sreehari
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri. K.P.Khaleel Ibrahim
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Boundary Fixation
Outcome:
Not Decided
Description:
Seeking boundary fixation
Evidence:
Suit for fixation of boundary. Matter settled between parties. Statement also filed. Hence no necessity to proceed with this suit. Hence dismissed.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit - Boundary Fixation
Category
Injunction and Access Rights
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Abdul Rasakh vs Muhammed Abdu rehman regarding boundary fixation
Case Code Year
Case between Abdul Rasakh vs Muhammed Abdu rehman regarding boundary fixation